ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021
Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Accurately Detecting Skin Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for classification and detection of oral mucosa lesions on photographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Pooled it
- The accuracy of artificial intelligence used for non-melanoma skin cancer diagnoses: a meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for the Classification of Pigmented Skin Lesions in Populations with Skin of Color: A Systematic Review.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- DermaScanAI an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for automated skin lesion classification using dual attention and metadata fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Microscopic Diagnostic Techniques forJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2026Article
- A dual-stream deep learning framework for skin cancer classification using histopathological-inherited and vision-based feature extraction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mobile applications for skin cancer detection are vulnerable to physical camera-based adversarial attacks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning approaches for classification tasks in medical X-ray, MRI, and ultrasound images: a scoping review.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection in Asia-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education-Policies and Training at US Osteopathic Medical Schools: Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Decoding skin cancer classification: perspectives, insights, and advances through researchers' lens.Scientific reports · 2024Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Diagnosis and Molecular Classification of Head and Neck Skin Cancers: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Trained neural networking framework based skin cancer diagnosis and categorization using grey wolf optimization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring the Use and Implications of AI in Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Review
- Identification of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA Network Regulated by Hsp90 in Human Melanoma A375 Cells.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024Article
- Experiences of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative study of UK clinician and key stakeholder perspectives.BMJ open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning-based methodologies that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examined the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the data set size and the number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search for papers using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL), and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The studies included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria: being specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Extracted data were narratively synthesized, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics.
resultsWe retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, of which 53 were eligible for this review. Shallow AI-based techniques were used in 14 studies, and deep AI-based techniques were used in 39 studies. The studies used up to 11 evaluation metrics to assess the proposed models, where 39 studies used accuracy as the primary evaluation metric. Overall, studies that used smaller data sets reported higher accuracy.
conclusionsThis paper examined multiple AI-based skin cancer detection models. However, a direct comparison between methods was hindered by the varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types. Performance scores were affected by factors such as data set size, number of diagnostic classes, and techniques. Hence, the reliability of shallow and deep models with higher accuracy scores was questionable since they were trained and tested on relatively small data sets of a few diagnostic classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.