Trial reportAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2022
What's up with WhatsApp in supplementing surgical education: an objective assessment.
Trial report in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moulding Breasts, Shaping Lives: Propagating Oncoplastic Surgery.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of digital technology for feedback exchange in clinical training: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis is the first study aimed at objectively quantifying the benefit of virtual education using WhatsApp-based discussion groups.
methodsA prospective, non-randomised interventional study was undertaken in the Department of General Surgery, at a tertiary care centre in Kolkata, India, with 200 undergraduate students over a period of 5 days each for 2 weeks, with the first week acting as a control arm. A WhatsApp group was created consisting of 197 eligible undergraduates, faculty members and the authors of this study. Each day, three questions were posted on this group. The second week involved an hour-long WhatsApp-based discussion between the participants and the faculty. Responses were recorded and compared for improvements between the two weeks. Participant feedback was collected and analysed.
resultsStatistically significant improvements were observed in the study group compared with the control group in rates of one in three, two in three and three in three correct responses (
conclusionsWhatsApp was found to be a satisfactory supplement to traditional medical teaching. It can be implemented to fill lapses in medical education, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has caused great disruption to traditional teaching methods. Research is needed to assess the feasibility of incorporating it into the curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.