Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34821250›Full record

ReviewNatural product reports2021

Advances in decomposing complex metabolite mixtures using substructure- and network-based computational metabolomics approaches.

Mehdi A Beniddir, Kyo Bin Kang, Grégory Genta-Jouve, Florian Huber, Simon Rogers, Justin J J van der Hooft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural product reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mass Spectrometry as a Tool for Metabolomics in Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Metabolomic Profiling ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehdi A BeniddirUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, BioCIS, 5 rue J.-B Clément, 92290 Châtenay-Malabry, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2153-4290
Kyo Bin KangResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3290-1017
Grégory Genta-JouveLaboratoire de Chimie-Toxicologie Analytique et Cellulaire (C-TAC), UMR CNRS 8038, CiTCoM, Université de Paris, 4, Avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-4371
Florian HuberNetherlands eScience Center, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3535-9406
Simon RogersSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-4477
Justin J J van der HooftBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands. justin.vanderhooft@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-5511

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R022054/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covering: up to the end of 2020Recently introduced computational metabolome mining tools have started to positively impact the chemical and biological interpretation of untargeted metabolomics analyses. We believe that these current advances make it possible to start decomposing complex metabolite mixtures into substructure and chemical class information, thereby supporting pivotal tasks in metabolomics analysis including metabolite annotation, the comparison of metabolic profiles, and network analyses. In this review, we highlight and explain key tools and emerging strategies covering 2015 up to the end of 2020. The majority of these tools aim at processing and analyzing liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry fragmentation data. We start with defining what substructures are, how they relate to molecular fingerprints, and how recognizing them helps to decompose complex mixtures. We continue with chemical classes that are based on the presence or absence of particular molecular scaffolds and/or functional groups and are thus intrinsically related to substructures. We discuss novel tools to mine substructures, annotate chemical compound classes, and create mass spectral networks from metabolomics data and demonstrate them using two case studies. We also review and speculate about the opportunities that NMR spectroscopy-based metabolome mining of complex metabolite mixtures offers to discover substructures and chemical classes. Finally, we will describe the main benefits and limitations of the current tools and strategies that rely on them, and our vision on how this exciting field can develop toward repository-scale-sized metabolomics analyses. Complementary sources of structural information from genomics analyses and well-curated taxonomic records are also discussed. Many research fields such as natural products discovery, pharmacokinetic and drug metabolism studies, and environmental metabolomics increasingly rely on untargeted metabolomics to gain biochemical and biological insights. The here described technical advances will benefit all those metabolomics disciplines by transforming spectral data into knowledge that can answer biological questions.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidComplex MixturesFlavonesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsSideritisTandem Mass SpectrometryComplex MixturesFlavones

Identifiers

PMID34821250
PMCPMC8597898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.