Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34821068›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Correlation between circulating tumor DNA and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Hiroki Osumi, Eiji Shinozaki, Akira Ooki, Keitaro Shimozaki, Daisaku Kamiimabeppu, Izuma Nakayama, Takeru Wakatsuki, Mariko Ogura, Daisuke Takahari, Keisho Chin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroki OsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4742-0446
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7448-5894
Akira OokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Keitaro ShimozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisaku KamiimabeppuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeru WakatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko OguraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke TakahariDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisho ChinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKEN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker with potential to reflect comprehensive genomic information and overcome intratumor heterogeneity. In contrast, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a conventional tumor marker for predicting recurrence, survival, and chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the relationship between them remains unclear. Here, the relationship between plasma ctDNA and CEA levels was evaluated to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of their clinical use.

methodsA total of 110 patients with mCRC underwent chemotherapy were enrolled. Amplicon-based plasma genomic profiling of 14 genes that are commonly mutated in CRC by next-generation sequencing was compared to the CEA level and tumor diameter using Spearman's correlation coefficient.

resultsThe overall concordance rate between the ctDNA and CEA levels was 75.5% (83/110). The correlation coefficient between the ctDNA and CEA levels was lower in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.18, p = 0.44) than in the group of patients with liver metastasis (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Although the correlation coefficients between tumor diameter and both ctDNA and CEA levels were high in the group of patients with liver metastasis, only the CEA correlation coefficient was maintained in the group of patients without liver and lymph node metastases (r = 0.53, p = 0.01). The characteristics that influenced discordance were liver metastasis and the sum of tumor diameter.

conclusionsThe status of ctDNA and CEA may not be consistent in patients with mCRC without liver metastasis or with a low tumor volume; both results should be considered when deciding a treatment strategy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCirculating Tumor DNAcarcinoembryonic antigencirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsymetastatic colorectal cancermetastatic organ

Identifiers

PMID34821068
PMCPMC8683548
OpenAlexW3216604651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.