Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820792›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy2022

Effectiveness and adverse events of endoscopic clipping versus band ligation for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: a large-scale multicenter cohort study.

Katsumasa Kobayashi, Naoyoshi Nagata, Yohei Furumoto, Atsushi Yamauchi, Atsuo Yamada, Jun Omori, Takashi Ikeya, Taiki Aoyama, Naoyuki Tominaga, Yoshinori Sato and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Clinical utility of a novel double-band endoscopic band ligation device for consecutive ligation in the management of diverticular bleeding.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Katsumasa KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7692-0557
Naoyoshi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei FurumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi YamauchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kitano Hospital, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7670-0359
Atsuo YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi IkeyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiki AoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Naoyuki TominagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saga Medical Center Koseikan, Saga, Japan.
Yoshinori SatoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takaaki KishinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases, Nara City Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Naoki IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Shinagawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsunaki SawadaDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Masaki MurataDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Akinari TakaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro MizukamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Ken KinjoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shunji FujimoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Chiba, Japan.
Takahiro UotaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Minoru FujitaDivision of Endoscopy and Ultrasonography, Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroki SatoDivision of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-3724
Sho SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Digestive Disease and Division of Endoscopy, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Toshiaki NarasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Junnosuke HayasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuru KaiseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
CODE BLUE-J study collaborators
Nippon Medical School · JPTokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital · JPChiba Hokusou Hospital · JPFukuoka University · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPKitano Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPNara City Hospital · JPNew Tokyo Hospital · JPNiigata University · JPOita University · JPSaga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan · JPShizuoka Red Cross Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Medical University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have shown the effectiveness of both endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and clipping for colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) but have been small and conducted at single centers. Therefore, we investigated which was the more effective and safe treatment in a multicenter long-term cohort study.

methodsWe reviewed data for 1679 patients with CDH who were treated with EBL (n = 638) or clipping (n = 1041) between January 2010 and December 2019 at 49 hospitals across Japan (CODE BLUE-J study). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between the two treatments.

resultsIn multivariate analysis, EBL was independently associated with reduced risk of early rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.46;

Indexed as

Diverticulum, ColonHemostasis, EndoscopicCohort StudiesColonoscopyGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLigationMulticenter Studies as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34820792
PMCPMC9329063
OpenAlexW3217209067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.