Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820782›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2022

Autonomy and Care in Context: The Paradox of Sex Workers' Acceptability of HIV Self-Tests in São Paulo, Brazil.

Laura Rebecca Murray, Dulce Ferraz, Eliana Miura Zucchi, Isa da Silva Sorrentino, Alexandre Grangeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura Rebecca MurrayNúcleo de Estudos de Políticas Públicas em Direitos Humanos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Anexo do CFCH, 3º Andar, Av. Pasteur 250 Urca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22290-140, Brazil. lauramurray@nepp-dh.ufrj.br.ORCID 0000-0002-6245-2227
Dulce FerrazEscola FIOCRUZ de Governo, Diretoria Regional de Brasília, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Eliana Miura ZucchiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Mestrado Profissional em Psicologia, Desenvolvimento e Políticas Públicas, Universidade Católica de Santos, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Isa da Silva SorrentinoDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre GrangeiroDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisgender female sex workers (CFSW) continue to face structural barriers to HIV prevention. We analyzed the acceptability of the oral HIV self-test (HIV-ST) among CFSW as part of a pragmatic trial on HIV prevention in Brazil. Data from in-depth interviews conducted with 12 women from diverse sex worker contexts and participant observation were analyzed using thematic analysis. CFSW valued autonomy in their workplaces and saw the HIV-ST as a possibility for self-care. Some feared clients' reactions, manager reprimands, and a positive result. HIV and sex work stigma largely drove self-care practices and perceived acceptability of the self-test. We argue that the autonomy offered by the self-test presents a paradox: increasing autonomy on the one hand while risking sidestepping structural dimensions of HIV vulnerability on the other. These nuances must be considered in interventions promoting the HIV-ST by considering the specificities of sex worker contexts, addressing stigma, and effectively involving CFSW and their organizations in intervention development.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeHIV InfectionsSex WorkersBrazilFemaleHumansSex WorkSocial StigmaAutonomyBrazilHIV self-testSex workStigma

Identifiers

PMID34820782
PMCPMC8612389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.