Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820748›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Telemedical percussion: objectifying a fundamental clinical examination technique for telemedicine.

Roman Krumpholz, Jonas Fuchtmann, Maximilian Berlet, Annika Hangleiter, Daniel Ostler, Hubertus Feussner, Dirk Wilhelm

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roman Krumpholz *Research Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. roman.krumpholz@tum.de.
Jonas Fuchtmann *Research Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian BerletResearch Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annika HangleiterResearch Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel OstlerResearch Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hubertus FeussnerResearch Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmResearch Group MITI - Minimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 030 310078-5766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile demand for telemedicine is increasing, patients are currently restricted to tele-consultation for the most part. Fundamental diagnostics like the percussion still require the in person expertize of a physician. To meet today's challenges, a transformation of the manual percussion into a standardized, digital version, ready for telemedical execution is required.

methodsIn conjunction with a comprehensive telemedical diagnostic system, in which patients can get examined by a remote-physician, a series of three robotic end-effectors for mechanical percussion were developed. Comprising a motor, a magnetic and a pneumatic-based version, the devices strike a pleximeter to perform the percussion. Emitted sounds were captured using a microphone-equipped stethoscope. The 84 recordings were further integrated into a survey in order to classify lung and non-lung samples.

resultsThe study with 21 participants comprised physicians, medical students and non-medical-related raters in equal parts. With 71.4% correctly classified samples, the ventral motorized device prevailed. While the result is significantly better compared to a manual or pneumatic percussion in this very setup, it only has a small edge over the magnetic devices. In addition, for all ventral versions non-lung regions were rather correctly identified than lung regions.

conclusionThe overall setup proves the feasibility of a telemedical percussion. Despite the fact, that produced sounds differ compared to today's manual technique, the study shows that a standardized mechanical percussion has the potential to improve the gold standard's accuracy. While further extensive medical evaluation is yet to come, the system paves the way for future uncompromised remote examinations.

Indexed as

PhysiciansRoboticsTelemedicineHumansPercussionSurveys and QuestionnairesAuscultationPercussionRobotic examinationRobotic percussionTele-diagnosticTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34820748
PMCPMC8612625
OpenAlexW3214946985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.