ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Effect of repeated ultrasonic instrumentation on single-unit crowns: a laboratory study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of root canal therapy or full pulpotomy using two endodontic biomaterials in mature permanent teeth: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Trial
- Ultrasonic Cavity Preparation with CVD Diamond Tips: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study of Dentin Surface Morphology and Smear Layer Formation.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Quality of CAD-CAM inlays placed on aged resin-based composite restorations used as deep margin elevation: a laboratory study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- In Vitro Investigation of Material Combinations for Meso- and Suprastructures in a Biomimetic Approach to Restore One-Piece Zirconia Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of repeated ultrasonic instrumentation on single-unit crowns: a laboratory study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis laboratory study aimed to assess the effects of ultrasonic instrumentation, simulating 10 years of supportive periodontal therapy (SPT), on single-unit crowns. MATERIALS AND
methodsStandardized crowns were fabricated from porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) (n = 12), zirconia (ZrO
resultsDuring simulated SPT, bulk fractures (n = 2) and a de-cementation failure (n = 1) of LDS and ZrO
conclusionsRepeated ultrasonic instrumentation may damage single-unit crowns. PFM crowns with a narrow, all-ceramic margin are especially prone to defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Frequent ultrasonic instrumentation of restoration margins of fixed dental prostheses, PFM crowns in particular, ought to be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34820725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.