Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820715›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2022

Concordance of the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and its distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy specimens: an interobserver agreement study.

Kenji Notohara, Terumi Kamisawa, Toru Furukawa, Noriyoshi Fukushima, Takeshi Uehara, Satomi Kasashima, Eisuke Iwasaki, Atsushi Kanno, Atsuhiro Kawashima, Kensuke Kubota and 30 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji NotoharaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan. notohara@kchnet.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5618-1312
Terumi KamisawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru FurukawaDepartment of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Noriyoshi FukushimaDepartment of Pathology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Takeshi UeharaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Satomi KasashimaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Graduate School of Health Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Eisuke IwasakiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi KannoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Atsuhiro KawashimaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kanazawa Medical Center, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kensuke KubotaDepatment of Endoscopy, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yasuhiro KuraishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Masayo MotoyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Itaru NaitohDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takayoshi NishinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan.
Junichi SakagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoko ShimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruko TomonoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinichi AishimaDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Yuki FukumuraDepartment of Human Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi HirabayashiDepartment of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Motohiro KojimaDivision of Pathology, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tomoko MitsuhashiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshiki NaitoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan.
Nobuyuki OhikeDepartment of Pathology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takuma TajiriDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Japan.
Hiroshi YamaguchiDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Hideyo FujiwaraDepartment of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
Emi IbukiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kagawa University, Kita-gun, Japan.
Shota KobayashiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Masashi MiyaokaDepartment of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Mamiko NagaseDepartment of Organ Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan.
Junko NakashimaDepartment of Pathology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nangoku, Japan.
Masamichi NakayamaDepartment of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Shinsuke OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
Daiki TaniyamaMolecular Pathology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Sho TsuyamaDepartment of Human Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Syunsuke WatanabeTokushima Red Cross Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Tsukasa IkeuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Shigeyuki KawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Matsumoto Dental University, Shiojiri, Japan.
Kazuichi OkazakiKansai Medical University Kouri Hospital, Neyagawa, Japan.
Shinshu University · JPJichi Medical University · JPJuntendo University · JPKansai Medical University · JPTokai University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPHiroshima University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPKagawa University · JPKanazawa Medical Center · JPKanazawa University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPKeio University · JPKōchi University · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKurume University · JPKurume University Hospital · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPMatsumoto Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) based on the findings obtained by an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is feasible, but the diagnostic consistency of this method has not been confirmed. We determined the interobserver agreement among 20 pathologists regarding the diagnosis of type 1 AIP, including the distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using large tissue samples obtained by EUS-FNB. After guidance for diagnosing AIP with biopsy tissues was provided, a round 2 was performed. The median sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PDAC vs. non-neoplastic diseases were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. In groups of specialists (n = 7) and the generalists (n = 13), Fleiss' к-values increased from 0.886 to 0.958 and from 0.750 to 0.816 in round 2. The concordance was fair or moderate for obliterative phlebitis and storiform fibrosis but slight for ductal lesion of type 1 AIP. Discordant results were due to ambiguous findings and biopsy tissue limitations. Among the specialists, the ratio of cases with perfect agreement regarding the presence of storiform fibrosis increased in round 2, but agreement regarding obliterative phlebitis or ductal lesions was not improved. Although the histological definite diagnosis of type 1 AIP was achieved by most observers in > 60% of the cases, the confidence levels varied. Because some ambiguities exist, the histological diagnostic levels based on the diagnostic criteria of type 1 AIP should not be taken for granted. Guidance is effective for improving accurate PDAC diagnoses (notably by recognizing acinar-ductal metaplasia) and for evaluating storiform fibrosis.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesAutoimmune PancreatitisCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsPhlebitisBiopsy, Fine-NeedleFibrosisHumansObserver VariationUltrasonography, InterventionalAutoimmune pancreatitisEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsyObserver variationPancreatic carcinomaPathologist

Identifiers

PMID34820715
OpenAlexW3217748397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.