Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820708›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2022

Uncovering how animals use combinations of magnetic field properties to navigate: a computational approach.

Susan Pizzuti, Margaret Bernish, Andrew Harvey, Luc Tourangeau, Cassandra Shriver, Catherine Kehl, Brian Taylor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncovering loggerhead (Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Magnetosensation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan PizzutiDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Margaret BernishDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Andrew HarveyDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Luc TourangeauDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Cassandra ShriverDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Catherine KehlDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Brian TaylorDepartment of Biology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 South Rd, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. brian.taylor@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0604-769X
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain animal species use the earth's magnetic field (i.e., magnetoreception) in conjunction with other sensory modalities to navigate long distances. It is hypothesized that several animals use combinations of magnetic inclination and intensity as unique signatures for localization, potentially enabling migration without a pre-surveyed map. However, it is unknown how animals use magnetic signatures to generate guidance commands. While animal experiments have been invaluable in advancing this area, it is a difficult phenomenon to study in vivo or in situ. Modeling and simulation present a powerful complementary tool that can be used to investigate whether and how animals use magnetic signatures to navigate. This perspective article summarizes work we have conducted that systematically and mechanistically uses modeling and simulation to study the use of magnetic signatures. We have studied this phenomenon from simulated agents that navigate in simple and abstract environments, to physical devices that navigate in realistic environments. The results have consistently demonstrated that this is a plausible way in which animals might navigate, and provided early insights into the environmental and animal-specific factors that are most important to this navigation strategy.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationMagnetic FieldsAnimalsComputer SimulationMagneticsSensationAnimal magnetic receptionMagnetic receptionMagnetic signaturesMagnetoreceptionNavigation

Identifiers

PMID34820708
OpenAlexW3215592705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.