Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820616›Full record

ArticleClinical hematology international2021

Baseline Photos and Confident Annotation Improve Automated Detection of Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Xiaoqi Liu, Kelsey Parks, Inga Saknite, Tahsin Reasat, Austin D Cronin, Lee E Wheless, Benoit M Dawant, Eric R Tkaczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hematology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoqi LiuDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Dermatology Service, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.
Kelsey ParksDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Dermatology Service, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.
Inga SakniteVanderbilt Dermatology Translational Research Clinic (VDTRC.org), Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 719 Thompson Lane, One Hundred Oaks Suite 26300, Nashville, TN 37204, USA.
Tahsin ReasatDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 361 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235-1662, USA.
Austin D CroninDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Dermatology Service, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.
Lee E WhelessDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Dermatology Service, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.
Benoit M DawantDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 361 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235-1662, USA.
Eric R TkaczykDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Dermatology Service, 1310 24th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.

Funding

Automatic analysis of 3D skin images for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) severity assessmentR21AR074589 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2019 to 2020
$381k
GVHD quantitative assessment in skin of Veterans post-HCTIK2CX001785 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI TKACZYK, ERIC R · 2019 to 2024
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001785NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR074589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous erythema is used in diagnosis and response assessment of cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). The development of objective erythema evaluation methods remains a challenge. We used a pre-trained neural network to segment cGVHD erythema by detecting changes relative to a patient's registered baseline photo. We fixed this change detection algorithm on human annotations from a single photo pair, by using either a traditional approach or by marking definitely affected ("Do Not Miss", DNM) and definitely unaffected skin ("Do Not Include", DNI). The fixed algorithm was applied to each of the remaining 47 test photo pairs from six follow-up sessions of one patient. We used both the Dice index and the opinion of two board-certified dermatologists to evaluate the algorithm performance. The change detection algorithm correctly assigned 80% of the pixels, regardless of whether it was fixed on traditional (median accuracy: 0.77, interquartile range 0.62-0.87) or DNM/DNI segmentations (0.81, 0.65-0.89). When the algorithm was fixed on markings by different annotators, the DNM/DNI achieved more consistent outputs (median Dice indices: 0.94-0.96) than the traditional method (0.73-0.81). Compared to viewing only rash photos, the addition of baseline photos improved the reliability of dermatologists' scoring. The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient increased from 0.19 (95% confidence interval lower bound: 0.06) to 0.51 (lower bound: 0.35). In conclusion, a change detection algorithm accurately assigned erythema in longitudinal photos of cGVHD. The reliability was significantly improved by exclusively using confident human segmentations to fix the algorithm. Baseline photos improved the agreement among two dermatologists in assessing algorithm performance.

Indexed as

baseline photoschange detectionchronic graft-versus-host diseasecomputer visionconvolutional neural networksCutaneous erythemalongitudinal photos

Identifiers

PMID34820616
PMCPMC8486973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.