Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820515›Full record

ArticleClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2020

Assessing a method and reference material for quantification of vitamin D binding protein during pregnancy.

Lisa E Kilpatrick, Ashley S P Boggs, W Clay Davis, Stephen E Long, James H Yen, Karen W Phinney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in the measurement of vitamin D binding protein.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa E KilpatrickNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material Measurement Laboratory, Biomolecular Measurement Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States.
Ashley S P BoggsNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412, United States.
W Clay DavisNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412, United States.
Stephen E LongNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Chemical Sciences Division, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412, United States.
James H YenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material Measurement Laboratory, Biomolecular Measurement Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States.
Karen W PhinneyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Material Measurement Laboratory, Biomolecular Measurement Division, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United States.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D plays a vital role in successful pregnancy outcomes for both the mother and fetus. Vitamin D is bound to vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) in blood and is carried to the liver, kidneys and other target tissues. Accurate measurements of the clinically measured metabolite of vitamin D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], depend on complete removal from the binding protein. It has been found that VDBP concentrations increase in maternal serum during pregnancy, obfuscating the accuracy of 25(OH)D concentration measurements in pregnant women. Additionally, measurements of VDBP concentrations during pregnancy have been performed using immunoassays, which suffer from variations due to differences in antibody epitopes, making clinical comparisons difficult. Quantification of VDBP is also of interest because changes in VDBP expression levels may indicate negative outcomes during pregnancy, such as preterm delivery and restricted fetal growth. To address the need for accurate measurement of VDBP during pregnancy, a method using liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS) was developed to quantify VDBP using isotopically labeled peptides as internal standards. This method was used to quantify VDBP in Standard Reference Material® (SRM) 1949 Frozen Human Prenatal Serum, which was prepared from separate serum pools of women who were not pregnant and women during each trimester of pregnancy. VDBP concentrations were found to be lowest in the serum pool from non-pregnant women and increased in each trimester. These data had good repeatability and were found to be suitable for reference value assignment of VDBP in SRM 1949.

Indexed as

25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin DAAA, amino acid analysisCV, coefficient of variationGC-globulinIsotope-dilutionLC-IDMS, liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometryLC-MS/MSLC-MS/MS, liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometryMRMMRM, multiple reaction monitoringNIST, National Institute of Standards and TechnologyPARs, peak area ratiosPregnancyQuantificationSRM, Standard Reference Material®TCEP, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochlorideTFA, trifluoroacetic acidTFE, trifluoroethanolVDBP, vitamin D binding proteinVitamin D binding protein

Identifiers

PMID34820515
PMCPMC8600997
OpenAlexW3001530421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.