ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2021
Pet-Friendly for Whom? An Analysis of Pet Fees in Texas Rental Housing.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Don't Forget Fido: A Call to Include Pets in Public Health Research and Policy to Support Families and Communities.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Exploring human-animal interactions beyond academic research: A rapid review of grey literature.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025Review
- Centering community voices: advancing health equity for people and pets in Los Angeles County through community-based participatory research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Housing-related companion animal relinquishment across 21 animal shelters in the United States from 2019-2023.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Barriers to finding and maintaining pet-inclusive affordable housing: Tenant experiences in Houston, Texas.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Longitudinal associations between allostatic load, pet ownership, and socioeconomic position among U.S. adults aged 50.SSM - population health · 2023Article
- The Impact of Sustained Ownership of a Pet on Cognitive Health: A Population-Based Study.Journal of aging and health · 2023Article
- Trends in Intake and Outcome Data From U.S. Animal Shelters From 2016 to 2020.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Increasing Engagement in Kitten Fostering Programs: Lessons Learned From High Kitten Intake Zip Codes in Los Angeles County.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have underscored the difficulty low-income pet owners often face when attempting to secure affordable rental housing. Further exacerbating this housing disparity are fees charged on top of normal monthly rent to pet owners in "pet-friendly" rental housing. In this study, we aggregated rental housing listings from the twenty most populous cities in Texas, USA from a popular online rental database. We paired the rental listings with census tract information from the American Community Survey in order to investigate economic and racial/ethnic patterns in the spatial distribution of the properties. We find that less expensive pet-friendly listings were more likely to have pet fees charged on top of rent than rental units that were more expensive. Additionally, when pet fee burden was defined as a function of average income by census tract, low-income communities and communities of color were more likely than higher income and predominantly White communities to pay disproportionately higher fees to keep pets in their homes. We also find patterns of spatial inequalities related to pet fee burden by a metric of income inequality by city. The burden of pet rental fees may contribute to both housing insecurity and companion animal relinquishment. We discuss these findings as they relate to inequalities in housing, with particular attention to marginalized and disadvantaged people with pets. We conclude with recommendations for policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.