ArticleFrontiers in surgery2021
Fusion of Technology in Cochlear Implantation Surgery: Investigation of Fluoroscopically Assisted Robotic Electrode Insertion.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Preclinical evaluation of a hydraulic actuation system with guide tube for robotic cochlear implant electrode insertion.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- ARTIS Pheno®: a potential tool for cochlear implant surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Advances in 3D Inner Ear Reconstruction Software for Cochlear Implants: A Comprehensive Review.Methods and protocols · 2024Review
- Robotized Cochlear Implantation under Fluoroscopy: A Preliminary Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The HEARO cochlear implantation surgery aims to replace the conventional wide mastoidectomy approach with a minimally invasive direct cochlear access. The main advantage of the HEARO access would be that the trajectory accommodates the optimal and individualized insertion parameters such as type of cochlear access and trajectory angles into the cochlea. To investigate the quality of electrode insertion with the HEARO procedure, the insertion process was inspected under fluoroscopy in 16 human cadaver temporal bones. Prior to the insertion, the robotic middle and inner ear access were performed through the HEARO procedures. The status of the insertion was analyzed on the post-operative image with Siemens Artis Pheno (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). The completion of the full HEARO procedure, including the robotic inner ear access and fluoroscopy electrode insertion, was possible in all 16 cases. It was possible to insert the electrode in all 16 cases through the drilled tunnel. However, one case in which the full cochlea was not visible on the post-operative image for analysis was excluded. The post-operative analysis of the electrode insertion showed an average insertion angle of 507°, which is equivalent to 1.4 turns of the cochlea, and minimal and maximal insertion angles were recorded as 373° (1 cochlear turn) and 645° (1.8 cochlear turn), respectively. The fluoroscopy inspection indicated no sign of complications during the insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.