Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820237›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Thoracic Paravertebral Block Applications in the Treatment of Acute Pain After Thoracotomy in Geriatric Patients.

Musa Zengin, Ali Alagoz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06618599 (Analgesic Effect of Mid-transverse Process to Pleura Block Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06618599 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Effect of Mid-transverse Process to Pleura Block Combined With Erector Spinae Block Versus Paravertebral Plane Block in Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsLung CancerArmsMid-transverse process to pleura block combined with erector spinae block, paravertebral block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Musa ZenginAnesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Ali AlagozAnesthesiology and Reanimation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) are commonly used in geriatric patients for pain management after thoracotomy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of TEA and TPVB on postoperative analgesia in geriatric patients who underwent thoracotomy. Methodology Postoperative analgesia follow-up files of patients over 65 years of age who underwent thoracotomy were analyzed retrospectively. Patient's demographic data, diagnosis, type of surgery, postoperative 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, static/dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores, need for additional analgesics, global pain assessment, and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression were examined. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated with TEA (Group 1) and those treated with TPVB (Group 2). Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data (p > 0.05). MAP in the TEA group was statistically significantly lower than in the second and sixth-hour TPVB group (p = 0.008, p < 0.001). VAS static scores in the TEA group were statistically significantly lower at 30 minutes (p = 0.001), and at one, two, six, twelve, and twenty-four hours compared to the TPVB group (p < 0.001, except at 30 minutes). VAS dynamic scores were statistically significantly lower in the TEA group at 30 minutes, and at one, two, six, twelve, and twenty-four hours compared to the TPVB group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia (p > 0.05). The use of additional analgesics in the TEA group was statistically significantly lower than in the TPVB group (p < 0.001). Conclusions More effective postoperative analgesia results with stable hemodynamic conditions were observed in geriatric patients who underwent TEA for thoracotomy compared to TPVB. Regarding side effects, although there was a lower incidence in TPVB, this was not statistically significant when compared to TEA. TEA, as a component of the multimodal analgesia approach, can be accepted as a safe and effective method in the elderly patient group who underwent thoracotomy.

Indexed as

geriatric patientspostoperative analgesiathoracic epidural analgesiathoracic paravertebral blockthoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID34820237
PMCPMC8606221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.