Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820109›Full record

ArticleChemical science2021

Structure prediction of cyclic peptides by molecular dynamics + machine learning.

Jiayuan Miao, Marc L Descoteaux, Yu-Shan Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular chameleons in drug discovery.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiayuan MiaoDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University Medford Massachusetts 02155 USA yu-shan.lin@tufts.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1112-1927
Marc L DescoteauxDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University Medford Massachusetts 02155 USA yu-shan.lin@tufts.edu.
Yu-Shan LinDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University Medford Massachusetts 02155 USA yu-shan.lin@tufts.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-2877
Tufts University · US

Funding

Resource for Biocomputing Visualization and InformaticsP41GM103311 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 2012 to 2017
$8.2M
Understanding and Designing Cyclic PeptidesR01GM124160 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI Yu-Shan Lin · 2017 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103311NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent computational methods have made strides in discovering well-structured cyclic peptides that preferentially populate a single conformation. However, many successful cyclic-peptide therapeutics adopt multiple conformations in solution. In fact, the chameleonic properties of some cyclic peptides are likely responsible for their high cell membrane permeability. Thus, we require the ability to predict complete structural ensembles for cyclic peptides, including the majority of cyclic peptides that have broad structural ensembles, to significantly improve our ability to rationally design cyclic-peptide therapeutics. Here, we introduce the idea of using molecular dynamics simulation results to train machine learning models to enable efficient structure prediction for cyclic peptides. Using molecular dynamics simulation results for several hundred cyclic pentapeptides as the training datasets, we developed machine-learning models that can provide molecular dynamics simulation-quality predictions of structural ensembles for all the hundreds of thousands of sequences in the entire sequence space. The prediction for each individual cyclic peptide can be made using less than 1 second of computation time. Even for the most challenging classes of poorly structured cyclic peptides with broad conformational ensembles, our predictions were similar to those one would normally obtain only after running multiple days of explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations. The resulting method, termed StrEAMM (Structural Ensembles Achieved by Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning), is the first technique capable of efficiently predicting complete structural ensembles of cyclic peptides without relying on additional molecular dynamics simulations, constituting a seven-order-of-magnitude improvement in speed while retaining the same accuracy as explicit-solvent simulations.

Identifiers

PMID34820109
PMCPMC8597836
OpenAlexW3213152276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.