Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820095›Full record

ArticleChemical science2021

Golem: an algorithm for robust experiment and process optimization.

Matteo Aldeghi, Florian Häse, Riley J Hickman, Isaac Tamblyn, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo AldeghiVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence Toronto ON Canada matteo.aldeghi@vectorinstitute.ai alan@aspuru.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-8806
Florian HäseVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence Toronto ON Canada matteo.aldeghi@vectorinstitute.ai alan@aspuru.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3711-9761
Riley J HickmanChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5762-1006
Isaac TamblynVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence Toronto ON Canada matteo.aldeghi@vectorinstitute.ai alan@aspuru.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-6667
Alán Aspuru-GuzikVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence Toronto ON Canada matteo.aldeghi@vectorinstitute.ai alan@aspuru.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-4434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous challenges in science and engineering can be framed as optimization tasks, including the maximization of reaction yields, the optimization of molecular and materials properties, and the fine-tuning of automated hardware protocols. Design of experiment and optimization algorithms are often adopted to solve these tasks efficiently. Increasingly, these experiment planning strategies are coupled with automated hardware to enable autonomous experimental platforms. The vast majority of the strategies used, however, do not consider robustness against the variability of experiment and process conditions. In fact, it is generally assumed that these parameters are exact and reproducible. Yet some experiments may have considerable noise associated with some of their conditions, and process parameters optimized under precise control may be applied in the future under variable operating conditions. In either scenario, the optimal solutions found might not be robust against input variability, affecting the reproducibility of results and returning suboptimal performance in practice. Here, we introduce Golem, an algorithm that is agnostic to the choice of experiment planning strategy and that enables robust experiment and process optimization. Golem identifies optimal solutions that are robust to input uncertainty, thus ensuring the reproducible performance of optimized experimental protocols and processes. It can be used to analyze the robustness of past experiments, or to guide experiment planning algorithms toward robust solutions on the fly. We assess the performance and domain of applicability of Golem through extensive benchmark studies and demonstrate its practical relevance by optimizing an analytical chemistry protocol under the presence of significant noise in its experimental conditions.

Identifiers

PMID34820095
PMCPMC8597856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.