Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34820029›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2021

A fundamental study assessing the generalized fitting method in conjunction with every possible coalition of N-combinations (G-EPOC) using the appendicitis detection task of computed tomography.

Tomoyuki Noguchi, Yumi Matsushita, Yusuke Kawata, Yoshitaka Shida, Akihiro Machitori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomoyuki NoguchiEducation and Training Office, Department of Clinical Research, Centre for Clinical Sciences, Japan.
Yumi MatsushitaEducation and Training Office, Department of Clinical Research, Centre for Clinical Sciences, Japan.
Yusuke KawataDepartment of Radiology, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Japan.
Yoshitaka ShidaDepartment of Radiology, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Japan.
Akihiro MachitoriDepartment of Radiology, National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreased use of deep learning (DL) in medical imaging diagnoses has led to more frequent use of 10-fold cross-validation (10-CV) for the evaluation of the performance of DL. To eliminate some of the (10-fold) repetitive processing in 10-CV, we proposed a "generalized fitting method in conjunction with every possible coalition of N-combinations (G-EPOC)", to estimate the range of the mean accuracy of 10-CV using less than 10 results of 10-CV. MATERIAL AND

methodsG-EPOC was executed as follows. We first provided (2N-1) coalition subsets using a specified N, which was 9 or less, out of 10 result datasets of 10-CV. We then obtained the estimation range of the accuracy by applying those subsets to the distribution fitting twice using a combination of normal, binominal, or Poisson distributions. Using datasets of 10-CVs acquired from the practical detection task of the appendicitis on CT by DL, we scored the estimation success rates if the range provided by G-EPOC included the true accuracy.

resultsG-EPOC successfully estimated the range of the mean accuracy by 10-CV at over 95% rates for datasets with N assigned as 2 to 9.

conclusionsG-EPOC will help lessen the consumption of time and computer resources in the development of computerbased diagnoses in medical imaging and could become an option for the selection of a reasonable K value in K-CV.

Indexed as

appendicitiscomputer simulationcross validationlearning curvemachine learningneural networks (computer)

Identifiers

PMID34820029
PMCPMC8607834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.