ArticleOncology letters2022
Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum miR-145 and vascular endothelial growth factor in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing miR-145 in NSCLC: mechanistic roles, diagnostic-prognostic utility, and therapeutic potential.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Potential of Exosomal and Non-Exosomal Biomarkers in Lung Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Using a Rat Model of Lung Carcinogenesis.Non-coding RNA · 2025Article
- A novel approach in the identification of microRNAs in malignant pleural effusion for lung cancer diagnosis.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Serum human epididymis Protein-4 outperforms conventional biomarkers in the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer.iScience · 2024Article
- Resident vascular Sca1iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have reported the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum microRNA (miR)-145 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in various types of cancer; however, their clinical use in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. The present study included 215 patients, 106 with NSCLC and 109 with other lung diseases (OLDs). miR-145 expression levels were determined using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and VEGF levels were measured using an ELISA. The diagnostic performance was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were employed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the markers. The biological function of miR-145 was examined in A549 and H1792 cell lines. The effects of miR-145 on cell proliferation of NSCLC cells were evaluated by flow cytometry, and the expression levels of miR-145 and cell cycle-related genes were determined by RT-qPCR. The results revealed that miR-145 and VEGF exhibited fair diagnostic performance [AUC, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.55-0.68) and AUC, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.57-0.71), respectively]. Combining age and smoking status with miR-145 and VEGF provided the best model for differentiating patients with NSCLC from those with OLDs (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.83). Furthermore, low serum miR-145 levels were associated with poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.85], whereas high VEGF levels were not associated with poor overall survival (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.81-2.68). In addition, the results of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.