ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021
Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Cannot Inhibit
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chlamydia trachomatis orchestrates multifaceted host cell manipulation for immune evasion.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Comparative transcriptomic profiling of human conjunctival epithelial cells and macrophages in response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Insights into innate immune cell evasion byFrontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Longitudinal changes in tear cytokines and antimicrobial proteins in trachomatous disease.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- In Silico Identification and Validation of Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Chlamydia Respiratory Infection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Indoleamine 2,3 Dioxygenase 1-The Potential Link between the Innate Immunity and the Ischemia-Reperfusion-Induced Acute Kidney Injury?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Neutrophil granulocytes are the major cells involved in Methods: Global gene expression screen was used to evaluate the effect of Results: Our results indicate that the Conclusions: IDO activity was not able to inhibit chlamydial growth in human neutrophils. Whether the IDO activity was not high enough for inhibition or other chlamydial growth-promoting host mechanisms were induced in the infected and interferon-treated neutrophils needs to be further investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.