Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819917›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Stress-Hormone Dynamics and Working Memory in Healthy Women Who Use Oral Contraceptives

Emma Sofie Høgsted, Camilla Borgsted, Vibeke H Dam, Arafat Nasser, Niklas Rye Jørgensen, Brice Ozenne, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Vibe G Frokjaer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emma Sofie HøgstedNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla BorgstedNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke H DamNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arafat NasserNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niklas Rye JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry Centre of Diagnostic Investigations, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brice OzenneNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dea Siggaard StenbækNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibe G FrokjaerNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women who use oral contraceptives (OCs) may have a higher risk of developing a depression, which is associated with both vulnerability to stress and cognitive dysfunction. OCs disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis by suppressing endogenous sex steroid production including estradiol. The HPG axis and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are known to interact, possibly through modulations driven by estradiol. OCs may affect HPA regulation capacity, i.e., disturb cortisol dynamics such as the cortisol awakening response (CAR), and influence cognition such as working memory (WM). We hypothesize that OC use is associated with blunted cortisol dynamics and impaired WM performance relative to non-users. Methods: Data from 78 healthy women in the reproductive age were available from the CIMBI database. We evaluated if CAR and WM differed between OC users (n=25) and non-users (n=53) and if the level of estradiol modulated the OC use effect on CAR or WM in generalized least square models. Results: We found that OC users had a blunted CAR (p= 0.006) corresponding to a 61% reduction relative to non-users; however, no estradiol-BY-OC use interaction effect was observed on CAR. Also, OC users had higher cortisol levels at awakening compared to non-users (p = 0.03). We observed no effect of OC use or an estradiol-BY-OC use interaction effect on WM. Also, within the OC user group, neither CAR nor WM was associated with suppressed estradiol. CAR was not associated with WM. Conclusion: Healthy women who use OCs have blunted cortisol dynamics relative to non-users. However, we could not detect OC use effects on working memory in our sample size. We speculate that disrupted cortisol dynamics may be important for the emergence of depressive symptoms in OC users.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesContraceptives, OralDenmarkEstradiolFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansHydrocortisoneMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSalivaStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultContraceptives, OralEstradiolHydrocortisonecortisolcortisol awakening responsedepressionestradiolhormonal contraceptivesHPA-axisoral contraceptivesworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34819917
PMCPMC8606688
OpenAlexW3214652277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.