ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021
A Descriptive Review of Global Real World Evidence Efforts to Advance Drug Discovery and Clinical Development in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agreement Between the Harmonized and the Self-Explanatory Versions of the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale in a Clinical Setting.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Value of Clinical Evidence and Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) Studies.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Perspectives in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Biomarkers, Omics, and Gene Therapy Informing Disease and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Relational, Ethical, and Care Challenges in ALS: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Metasynthesis of Nurses' Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Innovation: From Drug Discovery to Clinical Trials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sigma 1 Receptor and Its Pivotal Role in Neurological Disorders.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Observational
- Digital health solution for monitoring and surveillance of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Neuronal Hyperexcitability and Free Radical Toxicity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Established and Future Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding patient clinical progression is a key gateway to planning effective clinical trials and ultimately enabling bringing treatments to patients in need. In a rare disease like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), studies of disease natural history critically depend on collaboration between clinical centers, regions, and countries to enable creation of platforms to allow patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers to come together and more fully understand the condition. Rare disease registries and collaborative platforms such as those developed in ALS collect real-world data (RWD) in standardized formats, including clinical and biological specimen data used to evaluate risk factors and natural history of disease, treatment patterns and clinical (ClinROs) and patient- reported outcomes (PROs) and validate novel endpoints. Importantly, these data support the development of new therapeutics by supporting the evaluation of feasibility and design of clinical trials and offer valuable information on real-world disease trajectory and outcomes outside of the clinical trial setting for comparative purposes. RWD may help to accelerate therapy development by identifying and validating outcome measures and disease subpopulations. RWD can also make potential contributions to the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of new indications for approved products and to satisfy post-approval regulatory and market access requirements. There is a lack of amalgamated information on available registries, databases, and other sources of real-world data on ALS; thus, a global review of all available resources was warranted. This targeted review identifies and describes ALS registries, biobanks and collaborative research networks that are collecting and synthesizing RWD for the purposes of increasing patient awareness and advancing scientific knowledge with the hope of expediting future development of new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.