Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819800›Full record

ArticleAgricultural and forest entomology2021

Resolving the identification of weak-flying insects during flight: a coupling between rigorous data processing and biology.

Kirsty L Hassall, Alex Dye, Ilyas Potamitis, James R Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agricultural and forest entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsty L HassallComputational and Analytical Sciences Rothamsted Research West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0033-1136
Alex DyeRothamsted Insect Survey Rothamsted Research West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ U.K.
Ilyas PotamitisDepartment of Music Technology and Acoustics Engineering Hellenic Mediterranean University Crete Greece.
James R BellRothamsted Insect Survey Rothamsted Research West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioacoustic methods play an increasingly important role for the detection of insects in a range of surveillance and monitoring programmes.Weak-flying insects evade detection because they do not yield sufficient audio information to capture wingbeat and harmonic frequencies. These inaudible insects often pose a significant threat to food security as pests of key agricultural crops worldwide.Automatic detection of such insects is crucial to the future of crop protection by providing critical information to assess the risk to a crop and the need for preventative measures.We describe an experimental set-up designed to derive audio recordings from a range of weak-flying aphids and beetles using an LED array.A rigorous data processing pipeline was developed to extract meaningful features, linked to morphological characteristics, from the audio and harmonic series for six aphid and two beetle species.An ensemble of over 50 bioacoustic parameters was used to achieve species discrimination with a success rate of 80%. The inclusion of the dominant and fundamental frequencies improved prediction between beetles and aphids because of large differences in wingbeat frequencies.At the species level, error rates were minimized when harmonic features were supplemented by features indicative of differences in species' flight energies.

Indexed as

Aphidbeetleinsect classificationrandom forest classificationwingbeat harmonics

Identifiers

PMID34819800
PMCPMC8596709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.