Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819757›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Less Complexity in Hemodialysis Machines Reduces Time and Physical Load for Operator Actions.

Uwe Gründler, Eva Ekesbo, Martin Löwe, Adelheid Gauly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Uwe GründlerREFA Consulting AG, Dortmund, Germany.
Eva EkesboBetaHälsan AB, Lund, Sweden.
Martin LöweREFA Consulting AG, Dortmund, Germany.
Adelheid GaulyFresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, Bad Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-0711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInnovative hemodialysis systems are designed to ensure user safety and reduce operational time to allow health-care personnel to focus on patient care. The 6008 CareSystem has been developed to simplify the extracorporeal circuit of the system through a disposable cassette, automate operation steps, and facilitate handling in comparison to its predecessor - the 5008 CorDiax. The present investigations were performed with the aim of evaluating usability, safety, and ergonomic aspects of the new therapy system.

methodsA time-motion study compared these two hemodialysis systems with video and time recording of handling steps required to prepare, operate, and dismantle a dialysis machine. The ergonomic burden on hands and finger joints was evaluated in a second study, again by video-recording the simulated operation of both dialysis systems.

resultsThe number of handling steps required for the 6008 CareSystem and critical contact points were reduced by 26% in comparison to the 5008 CorDiax for patients with arteriovenous fistula used for vascular access and by 22% for those with a catheter used for vascular access. Total process time was reduced by 2.83 and 2.57 minutes using fistulae and catheters for vascular access, respectively. The number of hand grips and finger and thumb presses was reduced by approximately 50% and required less strength to execute.

conclusionThe most recent hemodialysis system confirmed its ease of use and user safety through fewer handling steps and less physical burden on the user. Shorter operational time should enable more patient-focused care.

Indexed as

ergonomicshemodialysis equipmentsafetyusability

Identifiers

PMID34819757
PMCPMC8607128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.