Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819727›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2021

Potentiality of Melittin-Loaded Niosomal Vesicles Against Vancomycin-Intermediate

Sirikwan Sangboonruang, Natthawat Semakul, Mohammad A Obeid, Marta Ruano, Kuntida Kitidee, Usanee Anukool, Kidsadagon Pringproa, Panuwan Chantawannakul, Valerie A Ferro, Yingmanee Tragoolpua and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. New Weapons to Fight againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Nano-Delivery System of Ethanolic Extract of Propolis TargetingNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Monkeypox virus: An emerging epidemic.Microbial pathogenesis · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sirikwan SangboonruangBiotechnology Section, Graduate School, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Natthawat SemakulDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Mohammad A ObeidDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Marta RuanoStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1087-4919
Kuntida KitideeCenter for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Usanee AnukoolDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-8972
Kidsadagon PringproaDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Panuwan ChantawannakulDivision of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Valerie A FerroStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-3603
Yingmanee TragoolpuaDivision of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0754-0638
Khajornsak TragoolpuaDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8812-5139
Chiang Mai University · THUniversity of Strathclyde · GBMahidol University · THYarmouk University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsThe antibacterial activity of melittin (Mel) on

resultsThe effective inhibitory activity of Mel on skin pathogens was demonstrated. Among the tested strains, VISA was most susceptible to Mel. Regarding to its function, Mel targeted the bacterial cell envelope and disrupted cell membrane integrity. Mel-loaded NISVs were successfully fabricated with a nano-size of 120-200 nm and entrapment efficiency of greater than 90%. Moreover, Mel-loaded NISVs were taken up and accumulated in the intracellular space. Meanwhile, Mel was released and distributed throughout the cytosol and nucleus. Mel-loaded NISVs efficiently inhibited the growth of bacteria, particularly MRSA and VISA. Importantly, they not only penetrated epidermal and dermal skin layers, but also reduced the bacterial growth in infected skin.

conclusionMel-loaded NISVs have a great potential to exhibit antibacterial activity. Therapeutic application of Mel-loaded NISVs could be further developed as an alternative platform for the treatment of skin infection via dermal and transdermal delivery.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal Skin InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMelittenMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusSwineVancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsMelittendermal and transdermal deliverydrug resistancemelittinniosomeskin infectionStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID34819727
PMCPMC8606986
OpenAlexW3212363947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.