The usefulness of nailfold capillaroscopy in "scleroderma-spectrum" disorders.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Renal Vascular Affection in Systemic Sclerosis Patients and Possible Correlation with Peripheral Vascular Involvement Assessed by Nailfold Capillaroscopy.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025
   Article
2. The usefulness of nailfold capillaroscopy in scleroderma-spectrum disorders: a single-centre observational study.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2024
   Article
3. The Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis: The Origin of Fibrosis and Interlink with Vasculopathy and Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
   Review
4. Nailfold capillaroscopy: tips and challenges.Clinical rheumatology · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.