ArticleNature2021
ecDNA hubs drive cooperative intermolecular oncogene expression.
Article in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 229 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
229 citing papers in PubMed, 316 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumour DNA and extrachromosomal DNA in prostate and bladder cancer: biology, clinical applications and future perspectives.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Genomic instability, postoperative recurrence and therapeutic vulnerabilities in resectable non‑small cell lung cancer (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Unraveling the lexicon of complex mutational phenomena in human cancers.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Extrachromosomal DNA as a platform for epigenetic reprogramming in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The shared evolutionary capacities of plasmids and extrachromosomal DNA.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Integrating molecular subtypes, genomics and functional dependencies to identify context-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities in small cell lung cancer.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- BRD4: From molecular understanding to therapeutics development.Molecular cell · 2026Review
- Genomic landscape and tumor immune microenvironment of osteosarcoma: Bridging mechanistic insights to precision therapeutics.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Extrachromosomal DNA in urothelial carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical applications.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Origins and consequences of oncogenic 3D chromatin remodelling.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- scAmp enables focal gene amplification analysis from single-cell data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Plasticity of extrachromosomal DNA segregation during drug adaptation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Phase separation of ecDNA condensates establishes in-trans contact domains that boost selective MYC regulatory interactions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Examining the role of extrachromosomal DNA in lung cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Telomere-driven replicative crisis is driven by large-scale changes in genomic architecture.Genome research · 2026Article
- MYC in Oncogenesis and Therapeutic Implications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Charting intratumor heterogeneity from bench to bedside.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Hybrid extrachromosomal DNA in HPV-driven cancers.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Tumor evolution: signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Exploring copy number alterations (CNAs) to gain new insight into SCLC heterogeneity.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is prevalent in human cancers and mediates high expression of oncogenes through gene amplification and altered gene regulation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.