Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819644›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2021

Protective role of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiota against a bacterial pathogen.

Christine M Vogel, Daniel B Potthoff, Martin Schäfer, Niculò Barandun, Julia A Vorholt

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A defined community of core gut microbiota members promotes cognitive performance in honey bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Specialization of independently acquired flagellar FliC proteins in plant-associatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Disease-induced changes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M VogelInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel B PotthoffInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin SchäferInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niculò BarandunInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia A VorholtInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. jvorholt@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6011-4910
ETH Zurich · CH

Funding

European Research Council 668991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aerial parts of plants are host to taxonomically structured bacterial communities. Members of the core phyllosphere microbiota can protect Arabidopsis thaliana against foliar pathogens. However, whether plant protection is widespread and to what extent the modes of protection differ among phyllosphere microorganisms are not clear. Here, we present a systematic analysis of plant protection capabilities of the At-LSPHERE, which is a collection of >200 bacterial isolates from A. thaliana, against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. In total, 224 bacterial leaf isolates were individually assessed for plant protection in a gnotobiotic system. Protection against the pathogen varied, with ~10% of leaf microbiota strains providing full protection, ~10% showing intermediate levels of protection and the remaining ~80% not markedly reducing disease phenotypes upon infection. The most protective strains were distributed across different taxonomic groups. Synthetic community experiments revealed additive effects of strains but also that a single strain can confer full protection in a community context. We also identify different mechanisms that contribute to plant protection. Although pattern-triggered immunity coreceptor signalling is involved in protection by a subset of strains, other strains protected in the absence of functional plant immunity receptors BAK1 and BKK1. Using a comparative genomics approach combined with mutagenesis, we reveal that direct bacteria-pathogen interactions contribute to plant protection by Rhizobium Leaf202. This shows that a computational approach based on the data provided can be used to identify genes of the microbiota that are important for plant protection.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAntibiosisArabidopsisBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaPhylogenyPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPseudomonas syringaeSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID34819644
PMCPMC7612696
OpenAlexW3216588781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.