ArticleScientific reports2021
DNA barcoding ferns in an unexplored tropical montane cloud forest area of southeast Oaxaca, Mexico.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contribution to the DNA barcode reference library for Réunion Pteridophyta.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- A DNA barcode reference of Asian ferns with expert-identified voucher specimens and DNA samples.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Testing the effectiveness ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Untying the Gordian knot of plastid phylogenomic conflict: A case from ferns.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Identifying cryptic fern gametophytes using DNA barcoding: A review.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA barcoding can be useful for species identification and phylogenetic analysis, but its effectivity has not been verified in most neotropical cloud forest plants. We tested three plastid barcodes, rbcLa, matK, and trnH-psbA, in selected pteridophytes, a well-represented group in these forests, from a little-explored area in Oaxaca, Mexico, applying the CBOL criteria for barcoding. We used BLASTn, genetic distance, and monophyly tree-based analyses employing neighbor-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference methods. Universal primers for rbcLa and trnH-psbA were successfully amplified and bi-directionally sequenced, but matK could not be amplified for most species. rbcLa showed the highest species discrimination in BLASTn (66.67%). trnH-psbA exhibited higher significant interspecific divergence values than rbcL and rbcLa + trnH-psbA (two-sample sign test, P value < 2.2e-16). Using NJ and ML phylogenetic trees, monophyletic species were successfully resolved (100%), differing only in support values and displaying full agreement with the most recent fern classification. ML trees showed the highest mean support value (80.95%). trnH-psbA was the only barcode that could detect the Elaphoglossoideae subfamily. Species discrimination did not increase using rbcLa + trnH-psbA. rbcLa is useful for fern barcoding, trnH-psbA is most helpful for phylogenetic analyses, and matK may not work as a universal barcoding marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.