Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819507›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Theory of branching morphogenesis by local interactions and global guidance.

Mehmet Can Uçar, Dmitrii Kamenev, Kazunori Sunadome, Dominik Fachet, Francois Lallemend, Igor Adameyko, Saida Hadjab, Edouard Hannezo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The Mechanics of Building Functional Organs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  4. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanism of branching morphogenesis inspired by diatom silica formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mehmet Can Uçar *Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria. mehmetcan.ucar@ist.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-4217
Dmitrii Kamenev *Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kazunori SunadomeDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dominik FachetInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4321-9304
Francois LallemendDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-0011
Igor AdameykoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-0356
Saida HadjabDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. saida.hadjab@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-8396
Edouard HannezoInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria. edouard.hannezo@ist.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-1561
Karolinska Institutet · SEInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Branching morphogenesis governs the formation of many organs such as lung, kidney, and the neurovascular system. Many studies have explored system-specific molecular and cellular regulatory mechanisms, as well as self-organizing rules underlying branching morphogenesis. However, in addition to local cues, branched tissue growth can also be influenced by global guidance. Here, we develop a theoretical framework for a stochastic self-organized branching process in the presence of external cues. Combining analytical theory with numerical simulations, we predict differential signatures of global vs. local regulatory mechanisms on the branching pattern, such as angle distributions, domain size, and space-filling efficiency. We find that branch alignment follows a generic scaling law determined by the strength of global guidance, while local interactions influence the tissue density but not its overall territory. Finally, using zebrafish innervation as a model system, we test these key features of the model experimentally. Our work thus provides quantitative predictions to disentangle the role of different types of cues in shaping branched structures across scales.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMorphogenesisAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGenes, ReporterIntravital MicroscopyModels, AnimalSensory Receptor CellsStochastic ProcessesZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34819507
PMCPMC8613190
OpenAlexW3214910733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.