Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819386›Full record

ArticleRMD open2021

Validation of a machine learning approach to estimate Clinical Disease Activity Index Scores for rheumatoid arthritis.

Alison K Spencer, Jigar Bandaria, Michelle B Leavy, Benjamin Gliklich, Zhaohui Su, Gary Curhan, Costas Boussios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A survey of artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison K SpencerData Science, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jigar BandariaData Science, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michelle B LeavyResearch, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA mleavy@om1.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-7248
Benjamin GliklichResearch, Noble and Greenough School, Dedham, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhaohui SuBiostatistics, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gary CurhanResearch, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Costas BoussiosData Science, OM1 Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDisease activity measures, such as the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), are important tools for informing treatment decisions and monitoring patient outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Yet, documentation of CDAI scores in electronic medical records and other real-world data sources is inconsistent, making it challenging to use these data for research. The purpose of this study was to validate a machine learning model to estimate CDAI scores for patients with RA using clinical notes.

methodsA machine learning model was developed to estimate CDAI score values using clinical notes from a specific rheumatology visit. Data from the OM1 RA Registry were used to create a training cohort of 56 177 encounters and a separate validation cohort of 18 726 encounters, 11 985 of which passed a model-derived confidence filter; all included encounters had both a clinician-recorded CDAI score and a clinical note. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), calculated using a binarised version of the outcome. The Spearman's R and Pearson's R values were also calculated.

resultsThe model had a PPV of 0.80, NPV of 0.84 and AUC of 0.88 when evaluating performance using the binarised version of the outcome. The model had a Spearman's R value of 0.72 and a Pearson's R value of 0.69 when evaluating performance using the continuous CDAI numeric scores.

conclusionA machine learning model estimates CDAI scores from clinical notes with good performance. Application of the model to real-world data sets may allow estimated CDAI scores to be used for research purposes.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidRheumatologyCohort StudiesHumansMachine LearningSeverity of Illness Indexarthritishealth carehealth services researchoutcome assessmentrheumatoid

Identifiers

PMID34819386
PMCPMC8614150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.