Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819275›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021

Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: test negative design study.

Ariel Israel, Eugene Merzon, Alejandro A Schäffer, Yotam Shenhar, Ilan Green, Avivit Golan-Cohen, Eytan Ruppin, Eli Magen, Shlomo Vinker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. COVID-19 Vaccines and COVID-19 in People Living with HIV.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariel IsraelLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel dr.ariel.israel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4389-8896
Eugene MerzonLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5469-0236
Alejandro A SchäfferCancer Data Science Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2147-8033
Yotam ShenharLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ilan GreenLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-7152
Avivit Golan-CohenLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2406-6402
Eytan RuppinCancer Data Science Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-3940
Eli MagenLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-423X
Shlomo VinkerLeumit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9804-7103
Tel Aviv University · ILClalit Health Services · ILNational Cancer Institute · USAriel University · ILBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether time elapsed since the second injection of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was significantly associated with the risk of covid-19 infection after vaccination in people who received two vaccine injections.

designTest negative design study.

settingElectronic health records of a large state mandated healthcare organisation, Israel.

participantsAdults aged ≥18 years who had received a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test between 15 May 2021 and 17 September 2021, at least three weeks after their second vaccine injection, had not received a third vaccine injection, and had no history of covid-19 infection.

main outcome measuresPositive result for the RT-PCR test. Individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and controls were matched for week of testing, age category, and demographic group (ultra-orthodox Jews, individuals of Arab ancestry, and the general population). Conditional logistic regression was adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbid conditions.

results83 057 adults received an RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period and 9.6% had a positive result. Time elapsed since the vaccine injection was significantly longer in individuals who tested positive (P<0.001). Adjusted odds ratio for infection at time intervals >90 days since vaccination were significantly increased compared with the reference of <90 days: 2.37 (95% confidence interval 1.67 to 3.36) for 90-119 days, 2.66 (1.94 to 3.66) for 120-149 days, 2.82 (2.07 to 3.84) for 150-179 days, and 2.82 (2.07 to 3.85) for ≥180 days (P<0.001 for each 30 day interval).

conclusionsIn this large population of adults tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR after two doses of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine, a gradual increase in the risk of infection was seen for individuals who received their second vaccine dose after at least 90 days.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineIsraelMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsBNT162 Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34819275
PMCPMC9083235
OpenAlexW3216422624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.