Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819153›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2021

Psychometric validation of the Korean version of PROMIS 29 Profile V2.1 among patients with lower extremity problems.

Youngha Kim, Danbee Kang, Eunjee Kang, Jihyun Lim, Sooyeon Kim, Heesu Nam, Sungkeun Shim, Mangyeong Lee, Young-Wan Moon, Seung-Jae Lim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Youngha Kim *Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Danbee Kang *Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eunjee KangCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jihyun LimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sooyeon KimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Heesu NamCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungkeun ShimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mangyeong LeeCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Wan MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung-Jae LimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351, Seoul, South Korea.
Ki-Sun SungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-Gu, 06351, Seoul, South Korea. kisun.sung@samsung.com.
Juhee ChoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jcho@skku.edu.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education 2020R1I1A2074210Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 18182MFDS407Samsung Medical Center Research and Development Grant SMX1210381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with lower extremity problems (LEP) commonly experience functional loss, pain, decreased range of motion, inadequacy in daily living activities, and structural change in radiographic evaluations. However, the traditional patient-reported outcome measurement which focused on symptoms, had a limited scope of applicability. This study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the Korean version of PROMIS-29 Profile v2.1 (K-PROMIS-29 V2.1), a multi-dimensional measure for assessing generic profile health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in a sample of patients with lower extremity problems (LEP).

methodsParticipants were recruited from the orthopedic outpatient clinics at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea from September to October 2018. Participants completed a survey questionnaire that included the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and the SF-36v2. Principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1.

resultsA total of 299 participants were enrolled in the study and 258 (86%) completed the study questionnaire. The mean age (SD) of the participants was 56.6 (14.5) and 32.3%, 29.8, and 25.2% of the study participants visited outpatient clinics for foot, knee, and hip problems respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 7 sub-domains in K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 ranged from 0.80 to 0.95, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. In CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices were high (CFI = 0.937 and SRMR = 0.061). High to moderate correlations were found between comparable subscales of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and subscales of the SF-36v2 (r = 0.55-0.70).

conclusionsThe K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing a broad range of health-related quality-of-life domains in patients with LEP. It would reflect the real-life symptoms experienced by patients with LEP.

Indexed as

FunctionLower extremity problemsPROMIS-29Quality of lifevalidation

Identifiers

PMID34819153
PMCPMC8614031
OpenAlexW3216329296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.