Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819138›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2021

Molecular differences of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells between non-responders and responders in treatment of  transphincteric perianal fistulas.

Michaela Tencerova, Lilli Lundby, Steen Buntzen, Stig Norderval, Helene Tarri Hougaard, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Moustapha Kassem

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04834609 (Identification of Molecular Differences of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Between Non- Responders and Responders in Treatment of Transsphincteric Perianal Fistulas Using Autologous Fat Graft Injection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04834609 nacompletednot on this map

Identification of Molecular Differences of Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Between Non- Responders and Responders in Treatment of Transsphincteric Perianal Fistulas Using Autologous Fat Graft Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2015 to 2021Enrolled27ConditionsPerianal Fistula, Adipose Tissue, Tissue TransplantationArmsInjection of autologous adipose tissue in anal fistula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michaela TencerovaMolecular Endocrinology and Stem Cell Research Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. michaela.tencerova@fgu.cas.cz.ORCID 0000-0001-8670-425X
Lilli LundbyDepartment of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark.
Steen BuntzenDepartment of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark.
Stig NordervalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsoe, Norway.
Helene Tarri HougaardDepartment of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark.
Bodil Ginnerup PedersenDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Moustapha KassemMolecular Endocrinology and Stem Cell Research Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Odense University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInjection of autologous adipose tissue (AT) has recently been demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment for anal fistulas. AT mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) mediate the healing process, but the relationship between molecular characteristics of AT-MSCs of the injected AT and fistula healing has not been adequately studied. Thus we aimed to characterize the molecular and functional properties of AT-MSCs isolated from autologous AT injected as a treatment of cryptogenic high transsphincteric perianal fistulas and correlate these findings to the healing process.

methods27 patients (age 45 ± 2 years) diagnosed with perianal fistula were enrolled in the study and treated with autologous AT injected around the anal fistula tract. AT-MSCs were isolated for cellular and molecular analyses. The fistula healing was evaluated by MRI scanning after 6 months of treatment. AT-MSC phenotype was compared between responders and non-responders with respect to fistula healing.

results52% of all patients exhibited clinical healing of the fistulas as evaluated 6 months after last injection. Cultured AT-MSCs in the responder group had a lower short-term proliferation rate and higher osteoblast differentiation potential compared to non-responder AT-MSCs. On the other hand, adipocyte differentiation potential of AT-MSCs was higher in non-responder group. Interestingly, AT-MSCs of responders exhibited lower expression of inflammatory and senescence associated genes such as IL1B, NFKB, CDKN2A, TPB3,TGFB1.

conclusionOur data suggest that cellular quality of the injected AT-MSCs including cell proliferation, differentiation capacity and secretion of proinflammatory molecules may provide a possible mechanism underlying fistula healing. Furthermore, these biomarkers may be useful to predict a positive fistula healing outcome.

trial registrationNTC04834609, Registered 6 April 2021. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04834609.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRectal FistulaAdipose TissueAdultHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAdipose-derived mesenchymal stem cellsAutologous adipose tissue graft injectionFistula healingStem cell potencyTranssphincteric perianal fistula

Identifiers

PMID34819138
PMCPMC8611942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.