Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819132›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2021

Development and evaluation of the focused assessment of sonographic pathologies in the intensive care unit (FASP-ICU) protocol.

Stefan Schmidt, Jana-Katharina Dieks, Michael Quintel, Onnen Moerer

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan SchmidtDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Goettingen, Georg August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Jana-Katharina DieksDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Goettingen, Georg August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. jana.dieks@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-919X
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Goettingen, Georg August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Goettingen, Georg August University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of ultrasonography in the intensive care unit (ICU) is steadily increasing but is usually restricted to examinations of single organs or organ systems. In this study, we combine the ultrasound approaches the most relevant to ICU to design a whole-body ultrasound (WBU) protocol. Recommendations and training schemes for WBU are sparse and lack conclusive evidence. Our aim was therefore to define the range and prevalence of abnormalities detectable by WBU to develop a simple and fast bedside examination protocol, and to evaluate the value of routine surveillance WBU in ICU patients.

methodsA protocol for focused assessments of sonographic abnormalities of the ocular, vascular, pulmonary, cardiac and abdominal systems was developed to evaluate 99 predefined sonographic entities on the day of admission and on days 3, 6, 10 and 15 of the ICU admission. The study was a clinical prospective single-center trial in 111 consecutive patients admitted to the surgical ICUs of a tertiary university hospital.

resultsA total of 3003 abnormalities demonstrable by sonography were detected in 1275 individual scans of organ systems and 4395 individual single-organ examinations. The rate of previously undetected abnormalities ranged from 6.4 ± 4.2 on the day of admission to 2.9 ± 1.8 on day 15. Based on the sonographic findings, intensive care therapy was altered following 45.1% of examinations. Mean examination time was 18.7 ± 3.2 min, or 1.6 invested minutes per detected abnormality.

conclusionsPerforming the WBU protocol led to therapy changes in 45.1% of the time. Detected sonographic abnormalities showed a high rate of change in the course of the serial assessments, underlining the value of routine ultrasound examinations in the ICU. Trial registration The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, 7 April 2017; retrospectively registered) under the identifier DRKS00010428.

Indexed as

Critical CarePhysical ExaminationUltrasonographyClinical ProtocolsHumansIntensive Care UnitsProspective StudiesCritical careCritical care echocardiographyGeneral critical care ultrasoundIntensive care medicineSonographyUltrasoundWhole-body ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34819132
PMCPMC8611927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.