ReviewConflict and health2021
The role of social capital in women's sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian settings: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Review in Conflict and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contraceptive access in displacement settings: a quantitative study of Syrians displaced to Türkiye.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Social capital and sexual and reproductive health and rights in Fiji: a scoping review of humanitarian preparedness and response planning and guidance documents.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Reproductive History and Infertility Risk: Insights from the 2017-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Collateral damage: the overlooked reproductive health crisis in conflict zones.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Sexual and reproductive health and rights in humanitarian settings: a matter of life and death.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Social capital and women's narratives of homelessness and multiple exclusion in northern England.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- The MidPIC study: Midwives' knowledge, perspectives and learning needs regarding preconception and interconception care.PloS one · 2023Article
- Using social capital to address youth sexual and reproductive health and rights in disaster preparedness and response: A qualitative study highlighting the strengths of Pacific community organisations and networks.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Identifying the Preparedness Components for Sexual Violence in Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial capital is an important social determinant of women's sexual and reproductive health and rights. Little research has been conducted to understand the role of social capital in women's sexual and reproductive health and how this can be harnessed to improve health in humanitarian settings. We synthesised the evidence to examine the nexus of women's sexual and reproductive health and rights and social capital in humanitarian contexts.
methodsWe undertook a systematic review of qualitative studies. The preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines were used to identify peer-reviewed, qualitative studies conducted in humanitarian settings published since 1999. We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest Health & Medicine, PubMed, Embase and Web of science core collection and assessed quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. We used a meta-ethnographic approach to synthesise and analyse the data.
findingsOf 6749 initially identified studies, we included 19 studies, of which 18 were in conflict-related humanitarian settings and one in a natural disaster setting. The analysis revealed that the main form of social capital available to women was bonding social capital or strong links between people within groups of similar characteristics. There was limited use of bridging social capital, consisting of weaker connections between people of approximately equal status and power but with different characteristics. The primary social capital mechanisms that played a role in women's sexual and reproductive health and rights were social support, informal social control and collective action. Depending on the nature of the values, norms and traditions shared by network members, these social capital mechanisms had the potential to both facilitate and hinder positive health outcomes for women.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the importance of understanding social capital in planning sexual and reproductive health responses in humanitarian settings. The analysis highlights the need to investigate social capital from an individual perspective to expose the intra-network dynamics that shape women's experiences. Insights could help inform community-based preparedness and response programs aimed at improving the demand for and access to quality sexual and reproductive health services in humanitarian settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.