ArticleJournal of translational medicine2021
High efficiency closed-system gene transfer using automated spinoculation.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transduction efficiency in clinical CAR T cell products: A retrospective study at a single center.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Impact of physical and chemical parameters on spinoculation for chimeric antigen receptor T cell manufacturing using a quality-by-design approach.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Optimizing T cell transduction: a novel transduction device for efficient and scalable gene delivery.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Hypoxia and HIF-1 inhibition enhance lentiviral transduction efficiency: a novel strategy for gene delivery optimization.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- Optimizing viral transduction in immune cell therapy manufacturing: key process design considerations.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Methodological Approaches for Increasing the Retroviral Transduction Efficiency of Primary NK Cells.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Article
- Optimized conditions for gene transduction into primary immune cells using viral vectors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Cell therapy biomanufacturing: integrating biomaterial and flow-based membrane technologies for production of engineered T-cells.Advanced materials technologies · 2023Article
- A feasibility study of different commercially available serum-free mediums to enhance lentivirus and adeno-associated virus production in HEK 293 suspension cells.Cytotechnology · 2022Article
- Establishment of the Primary Avian Gonadal Somatic Cell Lines for Cytogenetic Studies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Scaling up and scaling out: Advances and challenges in manufacturing engineered T cell therapies.International reviews of immunology · 2022Article
- Feasibility of post-induction consolidation with BCMA CAR-T cell therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not proceeding to ASCT: A preliminary case series.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGene transfer is an important tool for cellular therapies. Lentiviral vectors are most effectively transferred into lymphocytes or hematopoietic progenitor cells using spinoculation. To enable cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practice)-compliant cell therapy production, we developed and compared a closed-system spinoculation method that uses cell culture bags, and an automated closed system spinoculation method to decrease technician hands on time and reduce the likelihood for microbial contamination.
methodsSepax spinoculation, bag spinoculation, and static bag transduction without spinoculation were compared for lentiviral gene transfer in lymphocytes collected by apheresis. The lymphocytes were transduced once and cultured for 9 days. The lentiviral vectors tested encoded a CD19/CD22 Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR), a FGFR4-CAR, or a CD22-CAR. Sepax spinoculation times were evaluated by testing against bag spinoculation and static transduction to optimize the Sepax spin time. The Sepax spinoculation was then used to test the transduction of different CAR vectors. The performance of the process using healthy donor and a patient sample was evaluated. Functional assessment was performed of the CD19/22 and CD22 CAR T-cells using killing assays against the NALM6 tumor cell line and cytokine secretion analysis. Finally, gene expression of the transduced T-cells was examined to determine if there were any major changes that may have occurred as a result of the spinoculation process.
resultsThe process of spinoculation lead to significant enhancement in gene transfer. Sepax spinoculation using a 1-h spin time showed comparable transduction efficiency to the bag spinoculation, and much greater than the static bag transduction method (83.4%, 72.8%, 35.7% n = 3). The performance of three different methods were consistent for all lentiviral vectors tested and no significant difference was observed when using starting cells from healthy donor versus a patient sample. Sepax spinoculation does not affect the function of the CAR T-cells against tumor cells, as these cells appeared to kill target cells equally well. Spinoculation also does not appear to affect gene expression patterns that are necessary for imparting function on the cell.
conclusionsClosed system-bag spinoculation resulted in more efficient lymphocyte gene transfer than standard bag transductions without spinoculation. This method is effective for both retroviral and lentiviral vector gene transfer in lymphocytes and may be a feasible approach for gene transfer into other cell types including hematopoietic and myeloid progenitors. Sepax spinoculation further improved upon the process by offering an automated, closed system approach that significantly decreased hands-on time while also decreasing the risk of culture bag tears and microbial contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.