Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819063›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Immersive 360° videos in health and social care education: a scoping review.

Carolyn Blair, Colm Walsh, Paul Best

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06684977 (Virtual Reality and Post-Traumatic Stress - Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of Low-Cost Virtual Reality and 360 Video to Treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06684977 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Reality and Post-Traumatic Stress - Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of Low-Cost Virtual Reality and 360 Video to Treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen's University, BelfastRan2024 to 2025Enrolled15ConditionsPTSD - Post Traumatic Stress DisorderArms360 Video, VR Photoscan, Standard TF-CBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn BlairSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast, Northern Ireland. c.blair@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-5813
Colm WalshSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Paul BestSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on the pedagogical use of immersive 360° videos is a rapidly expanding area within health and social care education. Despite this interest, there is a paucity of empirical data on its application.

methodA scoping review methodology framework was used to search for relevant articles published between 1970 and July 2021. Six databases were used to identify studies using immersive 360° videos for training and education purposes within health and social care: PubMed, Ovid Medline, Psych Info, Psych Articles, Cochrane Database and Embase. Research questions included: Is there any evidence that immersive 360° videos increase learning outcomes and motivation to learn in health and social care education? What are the key pedagogical concepts and theories that inform this area of research? What are the limitations of using immersive 360° videos within health and social education? The four dimensions contained within Keller's ARCS model (attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) frame the results section.

resultsFourteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Learning outcomes confirm that immersive 360° videos as a pedagogical tool: increases attention, has relevance in skill enhancement, confidence in usability and user satisfaction. In particular, immersive 360° videos has a positive effect on the user's emotional response to the learning climate, which has a significant effect on users' motivation to learn. There was a notable lack of pedagogical theory within the studies retrieved and a general lack of clarity on learning outcomes.

conclusionStudies examining the effectiveness of such interventions remains weak due to smaller sample sizes, lack of randomised control trials, and a gap in reporting intervention qualities and outcomes. Nevertheless, 360° immersive video is a viable alternative to VR and regular video, it is cost-effective, and although more robust research is necessary, learning outcomes are promising. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Future research would do well to focus on interactivity and application of pedagogical theory within immersive 360° videos experiences. We argue that more and higher quality research studies, beyond the scope of medical education, are needed to explore the acceptability and effective implementation of this technology.

Indexed as

LearningSocial LearningAttentionEducational StatusHumansSocial Support360° videoing360° videosHead mounted displayHealth and social care educationImmersive technologyLiterature reviewPedagogyTrainingVirtual realityVR

Identifiers

PMID34819063
PMCPMC8611631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.