Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819044›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Factors associated with using the internet for medical information based on the doctor-patient trust model: a cross-sectional study.

Yang Fu, Tianwei Tang, Junhao Long, Bohuai Lin, Jiayue Li, Guohong Quan, Hanwen Yang, Chongbang Zhao, Mei Yin, Lei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Explicating the Cognitive Process of a Physician's Trust in Patients: A Moderated Mediation Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yang Fu *School of Humanities, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Tianwei Tang *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Junhao LongThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Bohuai LinThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Jiayue LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Guohong QuanThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Hanwen YangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chongbang ZhaoThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mei YinSchool of Humanities, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. dryinmei@163.com.
Lei ShiSchool of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. hydleishi@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet medical care has been advancing steadily, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the development momentum of Internet medical care in China is more vigorous. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with using the Internet for medical information, to examine the popularisation and implementation of Internet medical treatment and feasible strategies, and promote the further development of Internet medical treatment.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 408 medical patients who had used online medical services. The one-way analysis of variance or independent samples t-test was used to compare the differences in the influence of demographic characteristics on behavioural intentions of different people seeking medical care. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between different measurement variables. A mediation regression analysis was used to explore the mediating role of trust in Internet medical care.

resultsThe difference in the influence of Internet medical use frequency on the behavioural intention of different participants was statistically significant (F = 3.311, P = 0.038). Among the influencing factors, personal trust propensity (r = 0.387, P < 0.01), website credibility (r = 0.662, P < 0.01), hospital credibility (r = 0.629, P < 0.01), doctor's credibility (r = 0.746, P < 0.01), and online patient trust (r = 0.874, P < 0.01) were positively correlated with patients' behavioural intentions. In the analysis of intermediary factors, the total effect of the credibility of the diagnosis and treatment website on the behavioural intention of patients was 0.344. The total effect of the credibility of the diagnosis and treatment hospital on the behavioural intention of patients was 0.312; the total effect of the service doctor's credibility on the patient's behavioural intention was 0.385; the total effect of the personal trust tendency on the patient's behavioural intention was 0.296.

conclusionsThis study found defects in various factors that produce distrust in Internet medical treatment. It also reveals the positive effect of trust factors on the development and implementation of Internet medical treatment and provides some ideas for improving the use of Internet medical treatment by the masses.

Indexed as

COVID-19TrustCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetSARS-CoV-2Behavioural intentionsInternet medicalMedical informationPatientTrust

Identifiers

PMID34819044
PMCPMC8611174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.