Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819043›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Machine learning-based Radiomics analysis for differentiation degree and lymphatic node metastasis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Yong Tang, Chun Mei Yang, Song Su, Wei Jia Wang, Li Ping Fan, Jian Shu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Prognostic potential of radiomics evaluation of lung artery thrombus for pulmonary embolism patients.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Applications of artificial intelligence in biliary tract cancers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Application of AI on cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yong Tang *School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 4, Section 2, North Jianshe Road, Chengdu, 610054, Sichuan, China.
Chun Mei Yang *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Song SuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Wei Jia WangSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 4, Section 2, North Jianshe Road, Chengdu, 610054, Sichuan, China.
Li Ping FanDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. 934221663@qq.com.
Jian ShuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, and Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. shujiannc@163.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

Technology Strategic Cooperation Project Between Luzhou Municipal People's Government and Southwest Medical University 2019LZXNYDZ04The Health Committee of Sichuan province 19PJ151The Innovation Method Program of Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China M112017IM010700the Project of Southwest Medical University 2020ZRQNA041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiomics may provide more objective and accurate predictions for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). In this study, we developed radiomics models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and machine learning to preoperatively predict differentiation degree (DD) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) of ECC.

methodsA group of 100 patients diagnosed with ECC was included. The ECC status of all patients was confirmed by pathology. A total of 1200 radiomics features were extracted from axial T1 weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. A systematical framework considering combinations of five feature selection methods and ten machine learning classification algorithms (classifiers) was developed and investigated. The predictive capabilities for DD and LNM were evaluated in terms of area under precision recall curve (AUPRC), area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, and specificity. The prediction performance among models was statistically compared using DeLong test.

resultsFor DD prediction, the feature selection method joint mutual information (JMI) and Bagging Classifier achieved the best performance (AUPRC = 0.65, AUC = 0.90 (95% CI 0.75-1.00), ACC = 0.85 (95% CI 0.69-1.00), sensitivity = 0.75 (95% CI 0.30-0.95), and specificity = 0.88 (95% CI 0.64-0.97)), and the radiomics signature was composed of 5 selected features. For LNM prediction, the feature selection method minimum redundancy maximum relevance and classifier eXtreme Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance (AUPRC = 0.95, AUC = 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.00), ACC = 0.90 (95% CI 0.77-1.00), sensitivity = 0.75 (95% CI 0.30-0.95), and specificity = 0.94 (95% CI 0.72-0.99)), and the radiomics signature was composed of 30 selected features. However, these two chosen models were not significantly different to other models of higher AUC values in DeLong test, though they were significantly different to most of all models.

conclusionMRI radiomics analysis based on machine learning demonstrated good predictive accuracies for DD and LNM of ECC. This shed new light on the noninvasive diagnosis of ECC.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsArea Under CurveBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingCell differentiationExtrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaLymphatic metastasisMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID34819043
PMCPMC8611922
OpenAlexW3217016447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.