Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34819022›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

A study of generalization and compatibility performance of 3D U-Net segmentation on multiple heterogeneous liver CT datasets.

Baochun He, Dalong Yin, Xiaoxia Chen, Huoling Luo, Deqiang Xiao, Mu He, Guisheng Wang, Chihua Fang, Lianxin Liu, Fucang Jia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Baochun He *Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Dalong Yin *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Xiaoxia ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Third Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Huoling LuoShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Deqiang XiaoShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Mu HeFirst Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guisheng WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Chihua FangFirst Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lianxin LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China. liulx@ustc.edu.cn.
Fucang JiaShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China. fc.jia@siat.ac.cn.
Southern Medical University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost existing algorithms have been focused on the segmentation from several public Liver CT datasets scanned regularly (no pneumoperitoneum and horizontal supine position). This study primarily segmented datasets with unconventional liver shapes and intensities deduced by contrast phases, irregular scanning conditions, different scanning objects of pigs and patients with large pathological tumors, which formed the multiple heterogeneity of datasets used in this study.

methodsThe multiple heterogeneous datasets used in this paper includes: (1) One public contrast-enhanced CT dataset and one public non-contrast CT dataset; (2) A contrast-enhanced dataset that has abnormal liver shape with very long left liver lobes and large-sized liver tumors with abnormal presets deduced by microvascular invasion; (3) One artificial pneumoperitoneum dataset under the pneumoperitoneum and three scanning profiles (horizontal/left/right recumbent position); (4) Two porcine datasets of Bama type and domestic type that contains pneumoperitoneum cases but with large anatomy discrepancy with humans. The study aimed to investigate the segmentation performances of 3D U-Net in: (1) generalization ability between multiple heterogeneous datasets by cross-testing experiments; (2) the compatibility when hybrid training all datasets in different sampling and encoder layer sharing schema. We further investigated the compatibility of encoder level by setting separate level for each dataset (i.e., dataset-wise convolutions) while sharing the decoder.

resultsModel trained on different datasets has different segmentation performance. The prediction accuracy between LiTS dataset and Zhujiang dataset was about 0.955 and 0.958 which shows their good generalization ability due to that they were all contrast-enhanced clinical patient datasets scanned regularly. For the datasets scanned under pneumoperitoneum, their corresponding datasets scanned without pneumoperitoneum showed good generalization ability. Dataset-wise convolution module in high-level can improve the dataset unbalance problem. The experimental results will facilitate researchers making solutions when segmenting those special datasets.

conclusions(1) Regularly scanned datasets is well generalized to irregularly ones. (2) The hybrid training is beneficial but the dataset imbalance problem always exits due to the multi-domain homogeneity. The higher levels encoded more domain specific information than lower levels and thus were less compatible in terms of our datasets.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningAnimalsContrast MediaDatasets as TopicHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsPneumoperitoneumRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaDataset-wise convolutionGeneralizationLiver segmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID34819022
PMCPMC8611902
OpenAlexW3216605770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.