Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34818620›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2022

swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Jiachen Chen, Xin Zhou, Fan Li, Donna Spiegelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Challenges in Evaluating a Community-Level Intervention to Address Root Causes of Youth Violence.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiachen ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06511, United States; Department of Biostatistics, Boston Unversity School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, United States. Electronic address: chenjc@bu.edu.
Xin ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: xin.zhou@yale.edu.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: fan.f.li@yale.edu.
Donna SpiegelmanDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06511, United States. Electronic address: donna.spiegelman@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Comprehensive Translational Science Analytics Tools for the Global Health AgendaDP1ES025459 · NIEHS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
New Methods for the design and evaluation of large HIV prevention interventionsR01AI112339 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112339NIEHS NIH HHS DP1 ES025459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe stepped wedge cluster randomized trial is a study design increasingly used in a wide variety of settings, including public health intervention evaluations, clinical and health service research. Previous studies presenting power calculation methods for stepped wedge designs have focused on continuous outcomes and relied on normal approximations for binary outcomes. These approximations for binary outcomes may or may not be accurate, depending on whether or not the normal approximation to the binomial distribution is reasonable. Although not always accurate, such approximation methods have been widely used for binary outcomes. To improve the approximations for binary outcomes, two new methods for stepped wedge designs (SWDs) of binary outcomes have recently been published. However, these new methods have not been implemented in publicly available software. The objective of this paper is to present power calculation software for SWDs in various settings for both continuous and binary outcomes.

methodsWe have developed a SAS macro %swdpwr, an R package swdpwr and a Shiny app for power calculations in SWDs. Different scenarios including cross-sectional and cohort designs, binary and continuous outcomes, marginal and conditional models, three link functions, with and without time effects under exchangeable, nested exchangeable and block exchangeable correlation structures are accommodated in this software. Unequal numbers of clusters per sequence are also allowed. Power calculations for a closed cohort employ a block exchangeable within-cluster correlation structure that accounts for three intracluster (intraclass) correlations: the within-period, between-period, and within-individual correlations. Cross-sectional cohorts allow for nested exchangeable or exchangeable correlation structures defined by the within-period and the between-period intracluster correlations only. Our software assumes a complete design and equal cluster-period sizes. While the methods accommodate correlation structures of constant within-period intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) as well as a different within- and between-period ICC, it does not allow the between-period ICC to decay.

resultsswdpwr provides an efficient tool to support investigators in the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. swdpwr addresses the implementation gap between newly proposed methodology and their application to obtain more accurate power calculations in SWDs.

conclusionsIn an effort to make computationally efficient (and non-simulation-based) power methods under both the cross-sectional and closed-cohort designs for continuous and binary outcomes more accessible, we have developed this user-friendly software. swdpwr is implemented under two platforms: SAS and R, satisfying the needs of investigators from various backgrounds. Additionally, the Shiny app enables users who are not able to use SAS or R to implement these methods online straightforwardly.

Indexed as

Research DesignCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeCohort designsCorrelation structureCross-sectional designsGeneralized estimating equationsGeneralized linear mixed modelsR shinySample size estimation

Identifiers

PMID34818620
PMCPMC8665077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.