Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34818568›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2022

Effects of a 33-ion sequential beam galactic cosmic ray analog on male mouse behavior and evaluation of CDDO-EA as a radiation countermeasure.

Frederico C Kiffer, Krishna Luitel, Fionya H Tran, Riya A Patel, Catalina S Guzman, Ivan Soler, Rui Xiao, Jerry W Shay, Sanghee Yun, Amelia J Eisch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederico C KifferDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Krishna LuitelDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Fionya H TranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Riya A PatelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Catalina S GuzmanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ivan SolerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Rui XiaoDepartment of Pediatrics Division of Biostatistics, CHOP Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jerry W ShayDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Sanghee YunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Amelia J EischDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: eisch@upenn.edu.

Funding

The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at CHOP/PennP50HD105354 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Michael Byrne Robinson · 2021 to 2026
$9.2M
Basic Science Training Program in Drug Abuse ResearchT32DA007290 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SELF, DAVID W · 1992 to 2017
$6.7M
UPenn Post Baccalaureate Research Education Program.R25GM071745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BHOJ, ELIZABETH JOYCE, KESSLER, DANIEL S · 2005 to 2024
$6.4M
Regulation of adult neurogenesis by opiatesR01DA016765 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISCH, AMELIA J · 2004 to 2013
$4.0M
New Horizons in Adult NeurogenesisK02DA023555 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISCH, AMELIA J · 2007 to 2017
$1.1M
Molecular and chemogenetic control of dentate gyrus inputs: a novel approach to combat depression-like behaviorR21MH107945 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISCH, AMELIA J · 2015 to 2016
$451k
Deconstructing Depressogenic Susceptibility and Emotional Resilience in RatsR15MH117628 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND · PI LAMBERT, KELLY G · 2019 to 2019
$437k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105354NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA023555NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016765NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007290NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM071745NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH117628NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH107945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In long-term spaceflight, astronauts will face unique cognitive loads and social challenges which will be complicated by communication delays with Earth. It is important to understand the central nervous system (CNS) effects of deep spaceflight and the associated unavoidable exposure to galactic cosmic radiation (GCR). Rodent studies show single- or simple-particle combination exposure alters CNS endpoints, including hippocampal-dependent behavior. An even better Earth-based simulation of GCR is now available, consisting of a 33-beam (33-GCR) exposure. However, the effect of whole-body 33-GCR exposure on rodent behavior is unknown, and no 33-GCR CNS countermeasures have been tested. Here astronaut-age-equivalent (6mo-old) C57BL/6J male mice were exposed to 33-GCR (75cGy, a Mars mission dose). Pre-/during/post-Sham or 33-GCR exposure, mice received a diet containing a 'vehicle' formulation alone or with the antioxidant/anti-inflammatory compound CDDO-EA as a potential countermeasure. Behavioral testing beginning 4mo post-irradiation suggested radiation and diet did not affect measures of exploration/anxiety-like behaviors (open field, elevated plus maze) or recognition of a novel object. However, in 3-Chamber Social Interaction (3-CSI), CDDO-EA/33-GCR mice failed to spend more time exploring a holder containing a novel mouse vs. a novel object (empty holder), suggesting sociability deficits. Also, Vehicle/33-GCR and CDDO-EA/Sham mice failed to discriminate between a novel stranger vs. familiarized stranger mouse, suggesting blunted preference for social novelty. CDDO-EA given pre-/during/post-irradiation did not attenuate the 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty. Future elucidation of the mechanisms underlying 33-GCR-induced blunting of preference for social novelty will improve risk analysis for astronauts which may in-turn improve countermeasures.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitive DysfunctionRecognition, PsychologySocial BehaviorAnimalsCosmic RadiationDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOleanolic AcidRadiation Exposure2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-oic acid ethyl amideOleanolic Acid3-Chamber Social InteractionCharged-ParticleCountermeasureProtonSpace Radiation

Identifiers

PMID34818568
PMCPMC9755463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.