Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34818358›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Are conspecific social videos rewarding to chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)? A test of the social motivation theory.

Michele M Mulholland, Sarah J Neal Webb, Mary Catherine Mareno, Kenneth G Schweller, Steven J Schapiro, William D Hopkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele M MulhollandDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1957-0436
Sarah J Neal WebbDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States of America.
Mary Catherine MarenoDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2690-1144
Kenneth G SchwellerBuena Vista University, Storm Lake, IA, United States of America.
Steven J SchapiroDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States of America.
William D HopkinsDepartment of Comparative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States of America.

Funding

The National Center for Chimpanzee CareU42OD011197 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ABEE, CHRISTIAN R · 2012 to 2019
$19.7M
Hemispheric Specialization and CommunicationR01NS042867 · NINDS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOPKINS, WILLIAM D · 2002 to 2015
$3.3M
Genetic determinants of early brain development in an animal model of autism spectrum disorder (ASD)R21HD103490 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HOPKINS, WILLIAM D · 2021 to 2022
$446k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD103490NIH HHS U42 OD011197NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many claim that social stimuli are rewarding to primates, but few, if any, studies have explicitly demonstrated their reward value. Here, we examined whether chimpanzees would produce overt responses for the opportunity to view conspecific social, compared to dynamic (video: Experiment 1) and static (picture: Experiment 2) control content. We also explored the relationships between variation in social reward and social behavior and cognition. We provided captive chimpanzees with access to a touchscreen during four, one-hour sessions (two 'conspecific social' and two 'control'). The sessions consisted of ten, 15-second videos (or pictures in Experiment 2) of either chimpanzees engaging in a variety of behaviors (social condition) or vehicles, humans, or other animals engaged in some activity (control condition). For each chimpanzee, we recorded the number of responses to the touchscreen and the frequency of watching the stimuli. Independent t-tests revealed no sex or rearing differences in touching and watching the social or control videos (p>0.05). Repeated measures ANOVAs showed chimpanzees touched and watched the screen significantly more often during the social compared to control video sessions. Furthermore, although chimpanzees did not touch the screen more often during social than control picture sessions in Experiment 2, they did watch the screen more often. Additionally, chimpanzees that previously performed better on a task of social cognition and engaged in more affiliative behavior watched a higher percentage of social videos during the touchscreen task. These results are consistent with the social motivation theory, and indicate social stimuli are intrinsically rewarding, as chimpanzees made more overt responses for the opportunity to view conspecific social, compared to control, content.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionFemaleMaleMotion PicturesMotivationPan troglodytesRewardSocial BehaviorSocial CognitionSocial ConditionsSocial ParticipationSocial TheoryUser-Computer InterfaceVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID34818358
PMCPMC8612576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.