Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34818352›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

In-vitro antibiotic resistance phenotypes of respiratory and enteric bacterial isolates from weaned dairy heifers in California.

Sarah Depenbrock, Sharif Aly, John Wenz, Deniece Williams, Wagdy ElAshmawy, Kristin Clothier, Heather Fritz, Gary McArthur, Meera Heller, Munashe Chigerwe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Phenotypical and genotypical resistance testing ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Susceptibility ofVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah DepenbrockDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-776X
Sharif AlyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-5013
John WenzField Disease Investigation Unit, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Deniece WilliamsVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare, California, United States of America.
Wagdy ElAshmawyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Tulare, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2167-2442
Kristin ClothierCalifornia Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States of America.
Heather FritzCalifornia Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States of America.
Gary McArthurOwner, "Swinging Udders Veterinarian Services", Galt, California, United States of America.
Meera HellerDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States of America.
Munashe ChigerweDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture · USCairo University · EGWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial drug (AMD) use for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) continues to be concerning for development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in respiratory and enteric bacteria of cattle. This study aimed to provide data regarding AMR in respiratory isolates, and identify relationships between respiratory and enteric AMD susceptibility, in weaned dairy heifers. A cross-sectional study was performed between June of 2019 and February 2020, on 6 calf rearing facilities in California. Deep nasopharyngeal and rectal swabs were collected from 341 weaned heifers and submitted for selective bacterial culture and AMR testing. Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni were selectively isolated from respiratory samples; Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. were selectively isolated from rectal swabs. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined for selected isolates against 19 AMD. The proportion of resistant isolates was calculated using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (respiratory) or USDA NARMS (enteric) breakpoints; when no applicable breakpoint was available, the distribution of MIC was described and compared. Association between AMR in a calf's respiratory isolate and a higher or lower MIC of the matched enteric isolates was determined. More than 50% of P. multocida isolates were resistant to each of 7 AMD commonly used to treat BRD (florfenicol, gamithromycin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin and tetracycline). Resistance in respiratory isolates was only associated with higher matched enteric MIC for gamithromycin and tulathromycin. Multidrug resistance was reported in >70% of P. multocida and M. haemolytica isolates. Antimicrobial resistance, including multidrug resistance, in respiratory isolates appears to be widespread in weaned dairy heifers; this finding has not previously been reported and raises concern for the future efficacy of AMD used to treat respiratory diseases in weaned dairy heifers. Enteric bacterial MIC appear to have limited direct association with respiratory isolate AMR classification.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCaliforniaCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsWeaningAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34818352
PMCPMC8612539
OpenAlexW3216167931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.