ArticleMorbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002)2021
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.
Article in Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy outcomes among medically complex populations with high risk of pregnancy mortality in Virginia: a retrospective observational study.BMC medicine · 2026Observational
- Trends in Hospital Abortion During the First 2 Years of COVID-19 in Quebec, Canada: Results From a Population-Based Observational Study.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Observational
- Intimacy, Anonymity, and "Care with Nothing in the Way" on an Abortion Hotline.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2025Article
- Addressing Abortion Underreporting in Surveys with the List Experiment: Lifetime and Five-Year Abortion Incidence with Multivariate Estimation of Socio-demographic Associations in two U.S. States.Population research and policy review · 2025Article
- Understanding abortion legality and trimester of abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, three abortion-restrictive states.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024Article
- Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2024Article
- Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation.Contraception · 2024Article
- Lifetime abortion incidence when abortion care is covered by Medicaid: Maryland versus five comparison states.Health services research · 2024Article
- The impact of abortion restrictions on American mental health.Science advances · 2024Article
- Family Medicine Residents Desperate for Abortion Education.Family medicine · 2024Article
- Self-diagnosing the end of pregnancy after medication abortion.Culture, health & sexuality · 2024Article
- Putting Politics Aside: Supporting Pregnant Women Who Have Experienced Sexual Violence.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024Article
- Protect and Control: Coverture's Logics Across Welfare Policy and Abortion Law.Psychology of women quarterly · 2023Article
- Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2023Article
- Self-Managed Medication Abortion: Implications for Clinical Practice.The Linacre quarterly · 2023Article
- Progesterone-mediated reversal of mifepristone-induced pregnancy termination in a rat model: an exploratory investigation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- How the Dobbs Decision Could Affect U.S. National Security.Rand health quarterly · 2023Article
- Abortion Policy in the United States: The New Legal Landscape and Its Threats to Health and Socioeconomic Well-Being.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- "Am I the Only One Who Feels Like This?": Needs Expressed Online by Abortion Seekers.Social work · 2023Article
- An Assessment of Perspectives and Concerns Among Research Participants of Childbearing Age Regarding the Health-Relatedness of Data, Online Data Privacy, and Donating Data to Researchers: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problem/conditionCDC conducts abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions and number of abortion-related deaths in the United States. PERIOD COVERED: 2019. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies for 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. For 2019, 49 reporting areas voluntarily provided aggregate abortion data to CDC. Of these, 48 reporting areas provided data each year during 2010-2019. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. Abortion-related deaths from 2018 were assessed as part of CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS).
resultsA total of 629,898 abortions for 2019 were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. Among 48 reporting areas with data each year during 2010-2019, in 2019, a total of 625,346 abortions were reported, the abortion rate was 11.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 195 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2018 to 2019, the total number of abortions increased 2% (from 614,820 total abortions), the abortion rate increased 0.9% (from 11.3 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio increased 3% (from 189 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2010 to 2019, the total number of reported abortions, abortion rate, and abortion ratio decreased 18% (from 762,755), 21% (from 14.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and 13% (from 225 abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. In 2019, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (56.9%). Women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions (27.6% and 29.3%, respectively) and had the highest abortion rates (19.0 and 18.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively). By contrast, adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥40 years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions (0.2% and 3.7%, respectively) and had the lowest abortion rates (0.4 and 2.7 abortions per 1,000 women aged <15 and ≥40 years, respectively). However, abortion ratios in 2019 were highest among adolescents (aged ≤19 years) and lowest among women aged 25-39 years. Abortion rates decreased from 2010 to 2019 for all women, regardless of age. The decrease in abortion rate was highest among adolescents compared with any other age group. From 2018 to 2019, abortion rates decreased or did not change among women aged ≤24 years; however, the abortion rate increased among those aged ≥25 years. Abortion ratios also decreased or did not change from 2010 to 2019 for all age groups, except adolescents aged <15 years. The decrease in abortion ratio was highest among women aged ≥40 years compared with any other age group. From 2018 to 2019, abortion ratios increased for all age groups, except adolescents aged <15 years. In 2019, 79.3% of abortions were performed at ≤9 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (92.7%) were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. During 2010-2019, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained consistently low (≤9.0%). In 2019, the highest proportion of abortions were performed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks' gestation (49.0%), followed by early medical abortion at ≤9 weeks' gestation (42.3%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks' gestation (7.2%), and medical abortion at >9 weeks' gestation (1.4%); all other methods were uncommon (<0.1%). Among those that were eligible (≤9 weeks' gestation), 53.7% of abortions were early medical abortions. In 2018, the most recent year for which PMSS data were reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths, two women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion.
interpretationAmong the 48 areas that reported data continuously during 2010-2019, overall decreases were observed during 2010-2019 in the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions; however, from 2018 to 2019, 1%-3% increases were observed across all measures. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: Abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered quality contraceptive services in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.