ArticlemAbs
Agonistic nanobodies and antibodies to human VISTA.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanobody-based targeted cancer therapy and immunotherapy: fear not the future.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- A Four Amino Acid Intracellular Motif of VISTA Blocks Growth Receptor Signaling in Cancer Cells to Induce Tumor Suppression.Cancer research · 2025Article
- Immune inhibitory receptor agonist therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- A pair of promising immune checkpoints PSGL-1 and VISTA from immunotolerance to immunotherapy.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- The process using a synthetic library that generates multiple diverse human single domain antibodies.Antibody therapeutics · 2024Article
- Broadly Applicable Bispecific Linker Approach to Noncovalently Target Therapeutic Nanoparticles to Tumor Cells Expressing Carcinoembryonic Antigen.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- VISTA and its ligands: the next generation of promising therapeutic targets in immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- The IgV domain of the poliovirus receptor alone is immunosuppressive and binds to its receptors with comparable affinity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The V-domain Ig Suppressor of T-cell Activation (VISTA) is an immune checkpoint regulator that suppresses immune responses and is readily expressed on human and murine myeloid cells and T cells. This immunosuppressive pathway can be activated using VISTA agonists. Here, we report the development of murine anti-human VISTA (anti-hVISTA) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), anti-hVISTA nanobodies (Nbs), and cross-reactive rat anti-murine/human VISTA (anti-hmVISTA) mAbs. All mAbs and Nbs generated bound to VISTA (human and/or murine) with dissociation constants in the sub-nanomolar or low nanomolar range. Competition analysis revealed that the selected Nbs bound the same or a nearby epitope(s) as the human VISTA-specific mAbs. However, the cross-reactive mAbs only partially competed with Nbs for binding to hVISTA. All mAbs and one Nb (hVISTANb7) were able to strongly detect VISTA expression on primary human monocytes. Importantly, the murine anti-hVISTA mAbs 7E12 and 7G5 displayed strong agonistic activity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures, while Nb7 and rat anti-hmVISTA mAbs 3C3, 7C6, 7C7, and 7G1 also behaved as hVISTA agonists, albeit to a lesser extent. Cross-reactive mAbs 7C7 and 7G1 further displayed agonistic potential in murine splenocyte assays. Importantly, mAb 7G1 significantly reduced inflammation associated with the murine model of imiquimod-induced psoriasis. These agonistic VISTA mAbs may represent therapeutic leads to treat inflammatory disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.