Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022
Management of bone marrow biopsy related bleeding risks: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Skin-to-Bone Depth During Bone Marrow Biopsy: The Role of BMI, Waist Circumference, and Sex.Cureus · 2026Article
- Human Muscle-Derived Vascular Stem Cells Can Support Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells In Vitro.Stem cells international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone marrow biopsies are largely used for the diagnosis and prognostic of various hematological diseases. Complications are rare but can be as serious as hemorrhage. However, little is known about management of patients deemed at high hemorrhagic risk like thrombocytopenic patients or patients receiving antithrombotic drugs. The aim of the study was to describe the management of patients regarding their laboratory profile and antithrombotic treatment prior to bone marrow biopsy and the short-term outcomes, notably hemorrhage. We conducted a retrospective observational study between February 2007 and March 2018. A standardized form was used to collect data from patients' records, blood tests results, management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment before biopsy and complications including bleeding and thromboembolic events until 3 months after the biopsy. A total of 524 bone marrow biopsies were performed. No major bleeding events were reported. The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 0.19% (CI 95% 0.00-1.20) and was linked to low platelets counts (p = 0.002) and not to abnormal coagulation profile or antithrombotic therapy, whether or not a bridging therapy has been used. Anticoagulants were temporarily stopped before biopsy in most cases without subsequent thrombotic complications. Our data suggest that thrombocytopenic patients have a non-negligible bleeding risk. Coagulation profiling seems irrelevant. We propose an algorithm to assist the management of those patients, notably when receiving antithrombotic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34817787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.