Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817787›Full record

Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Management of bone marrow biopsy related bleeding risks: a retrospective observational study.

Lucile Grange, Martin Killian, Emmanuelle Tavernier, Ludovic Fouillet, Denis Guyotat, Emilie Chalayer

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucile GrangeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Martin KillianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France.
Emmanuelle TavernierDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Ludovic FouilletDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Denis GuyotatDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, Rhône-Alpes, France.
Emilie ChalayerDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie de la Loire, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, Rhône-Alpes, France. emilie.chalayer@icloire.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-6261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow biopsies are largely used for the diagnosis and prognostic of various hematological diseases. Complications are rare but can be as serious as hemorrhage. However, little is known about management of patients deemed at high hemorrhagic risk like thrombocytopenic patients or patients receiving antithrombotic drugs. The aim of the study was to describe the management of patients regarding their laboratory profile and antithrombotic treatment prior to bone marrow biopsy and the short-term outcomes, notably hemorrhage. We conducted a retrospective observational study between February 2007 and March 2018. A standardized form was used to collect data from patients' records, blood tests results, management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment before biopsy and complications including bleeding and thromboembolic events until 3 months after the biopsy. A total of 524 bone marrow biopsies were performed. No major bleeding events were reported. The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 0.19% (CI 95% 0.00-1.20) and was linked to low platelets counts (p = 0.002) and not to abnormal coagulation profile or antithrombotic therapy, whether or not a bridging therapy has been used. Anticoagulants were temporarily stopped before biopsy in most cases without subsequent thrombotic complications. Our data suggest that thrombocytopenic patients have a non-negligible bleeding risk. Coagulation profiling seems irrelevant. We propose an algorithm to assist the management of those patients, notably when receiving antithrombotic drugs.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowFibrinolytic AgentsAnticoagulantsBiopsyHemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsFibrinolytic AgentsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAnticoagulantsAntiplatelet agentsBlood coagulation testBone marrow biopsyHemorrhage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.