Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817738›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021

Self-awareness in Dementia: a Taxonomy of Processes, Overview of Findings, and Integrative Framework.

Daniel C Mograbi, Jonathan Huntley, Hugo Critchley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Metacognition impairment in stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Subjective cognitive decline: Memory complaints, cognitive awareness, and metacognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Are youPersonality neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Self Course: Lessons Learned from Students' Weekly Questions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel C MograbiDepartment of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. daniel.mograbi@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4271-2984
Jonathan HuntleyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Hugo CritchleySackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSelf-awareness, the capacity of becoming the object of one's own awareness, has been a frontier of knowledge, but only recently scientific approaches to the theme have advanced. Self-awareness has important clinical implications, and a finer understanding of this concept may improve the clinical management of people with dementia. The current article aims to explore self-awareness, from a neurobiological perspective, in dementia. RECENT

findingsA taxonomy of self-awareness processes is presented, discussing how these can be structured across different levels of cognitive complexity. Findings on self-awareness in dementia are reviewed, indicating the relative preservation of capacities such as body ownership and agency, despite impairments in higher-level cognitive processes, such as autobiographical memory and emotional regulation. An integrative framework, based on predictive coding and compensatory abilities linked to the resilience of self-awareness in dementia, is discussed, highlighting possible avenues for future research into the topic.

Indexed as

AwarenessDementiaHumansAgencyDementiaInteroceptionMetacognitionSelf-awarenessSelfhood

Identifiers

PMID34817738
PMCPMC8613100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.