ArticleInsights into imaging2021
Saliency-based 3D convolutional neural network for categorising common focal liver lesions on multisequence MRI.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in fatty liver diseases: insights from recent research trends.Hepatology international · 2026Article
- Interpretable deep learning framework based on contrast-enhanced MRI for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating artificial intelligence for a focal nodular hyperplasia diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- A two-step automatic identification of contrast phases for abdominal CT images based on residual networks.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Automatic localization and deep convolutional generative adversarial network-based classification of focal liver lesions in computed tomography images: A preliminary study.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- SenseCare: a research platform for medical image informatics and interactive 3D visualization.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Article
- Deep Learning Methods in Medical Image-Based Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Review
- MAIC-10 brief quality checklist for publications using artificial intelligence and medical images.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Focal Liver Lesion MRI Feature Identification Using Efficientnet and MONAI: A Feasibility Study.Cells · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe imaging features of focal liver lesions (FLLs) are diverse and complex. Diagnosing FLLs with imaging alone remains challenging. We developed and validated an interpretable deep learning model for the classification of seven categories of FLLs on multisequence MRI and compared the differential diagnosis between the proposed model and radiologists.
methodsIn all, 557 lesions examined by multisequence MRI were utilised in this retrospective study and divided into training-validation (n = 444) and test (n = 113) datasets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. The accuracy and confusion matrix of the model and individual radiologists were compared. Saliency maps were generated to highlight the activation region based on the model perspective.
resultsThe AUC of the two- and seven-way classifications of the model were 0.969 (95% CI 0.944-0.994) and from 0.919 (95% CI 0.857-0.980) to 0.999 (95% CI 0.996-1.000), respectively. The model accuracy (79.6%) of the seven-way classification was higher than that of the radiology residents (66.4%, p = 0.035) and general radiologists (73.5%, p = 0.346) but lower than that of the academic radiologists (85.4%, p = 0.291). Confusion matrices showed the sources of diagnostic errors for the model and individual radiologists for each disease. Saliency maps detected the activation regions associated with each predicted class.
conclusionThis interpretable deep learning model showed high diagnostic performance in the differentiation of FLLs on multisequence MRI. The analysis principle contributing to the predictions can be explained via saliency maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.