Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817732›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2021

Saliency-based 3D convolutional neural network for categorising common focal liver lesions on multisequence MRI.

Shu-Hui Wang, Xin-Jun Han, Jing Du, Zhen-Chang Wang, Chunwang Yuan, Yinan Chen, Yajing Zhu, Xin Dou, Xiao-Wei Xu, Hui Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shu-Hui WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Jun HanDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Jing DuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Chang WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China.
Chunwang YuanCenter of Interventional Oncology and Liver Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yinan ChenSenseTime Research, SenseTime, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yajing ZhuSenseTime Research, SenseTime, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xin DouSenseBrain Technology, SenseTime, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Xiao-Wei XuSenseTime Research, SenseTime, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hui XuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China. mr_xuhui@163.com.
Zheng-Han YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yongan Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, People's Republic of China. yangzhenghan@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-1732

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support ZYLX202101Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z181100001718070Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7184199Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund 2018-2-2182Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2018-2-2023National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFC0106900National Natural Science Foundation of China 61871276, 82071876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe imaging features of focal liver lesions (FLLs) are diverse and complex. Diagnosing FLLs with imaging alone remains challenging. We developed and validated an interpretable deep learning model for the classification of seven categories of FLLs on multisequence MRI and compared the differential diagnosis between the proposed model and radiologists.

methodsIn all, 557 lesions examined by multisequence MRI were utilised in this retrospective study and divided into training-validation (n = 444) and test (n = 113) datasets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. The accuracy and confusion matrix of the model and individual radiologists were compared. Saliency maps were generated to highlight the activation region based on the model perspective.

resultsThe AUC of the two- and seven-way classifications of the model were 0.969 (95% CI 0.944-0.994) and from 0.919 (95% CI 0.857-0.980) to 0.999 (95% CI 0.996-1.000), respectively. The model accuracy (79.6%) of the seven-way classification was higher than that of the radiology residents (66.4%, p = 0.035) and general radiologists (73.5%, p = 0.346) but lower than that of the academic radiologists (85.4%, p = 0.291). Confusion matrices showed the sources of diagnostic errors for the model and individual radiologists for each disease. Saliency maps detected the activation regions associated with each predicted class.

conclusionThis interpretable deep learning model showed high diagnostic performance in the differentiation of FLLs on multisequence MRI. The analysis principle contributing to the predictions can be explained via saliency maps.

Indexed as

ClassificationDeep learningFocal liver lesionModel interpretationMRI

Identifiers

PMID34817732
PMCPMC8613326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.